Bear Market Coming?
98 RepliesJump to last post
[quote=joedabrkr]
[quote=FreeLunch]
Here’s why I don’t think we’ll go much lower.
P/Es for Financials and Energy are AROUND 10
- How much Lower can THOSE sectors go?
[/quote]History tells us they can go lower, especially if the "E" starts eroding in the financials. Like if there were some major problems in the corporate debt market. We don't have anything like that developing, do we?
[/quote]
Joe, you sound like a stern bear.
Perhaps you would be interested in shares of ING Senior Income Fund? Its an income fund for especially for seniors' like yourself.
[quote=FreeLunch]
None of you have said what you think yet. Managed Money - Do you really think that none of the managers of your SMA account aren’t looking AHEAD? What do you think they are doing? After all, equities do trade on FUTURE EARNINGS potential & if they didn’t, Forward P/Es would not be a valuable tool at all?
Don't you think that The Consumer Staple stocks trading at 2X Forward earnings gives ANY INSIGHT at all?
Do you really think there is nothing to take from that?
[/quote]I understand what you're trying to get at, but I honestly don't care what the managers are looking at. That's their problem. I was a trader (not an investor) for 15 years. Now, I let someone else worry about those things.
Seriously, I simply gather assets and manage people relationships. I have handed over the responsibility of making money in the markets to others.
I will say, though, that even when I was trader, my systems were strictly techincal systems. I never looked at fundamentals.
[quote=AllREIT]
[quote=ManagedMoney]
Profitable trading strategies are not only
possible, they’re easy to construct, and you don’t have to know
anything about the future to trade profitably.
[/quote]
If this is so damn easy to do, why are slaving away as an FA?
First of all, I never said that trading is easy. I said that developing and writing winning trading strategies is easy.
Do you know the difference?
Give a winning trading system to 1000 people, and maybe 5 of them will have the discipline to follow it and be winning traders. The rest won't have the discipline to follow the system and will no doubt make a total mess of things. They will get killed, while the system keeps generating one winning trade after another.
By the way, I'm not slaving away as a FA. At this stage of my life, becoming an FA is like semi-retirement. I simply gather assets and manage relationships, while others are doing the real work.
Managed Money,
90% of my book is professionally managed too - if it wasn't, we'd both be pulling our hair out.
It's a tough market, and I can't find many "Value-looking technical charts" (if you know what I mean)
I've never been one Love buying into strength from a trader's perspective. My thing is, that now, it looks like the "trendlines" of my favorite stocks are rolling over.
I surely don't want to overanalyze things, but I enjoy it & love it. I just think the market needs to churn and consolidate for awhile...I guess. It's a tough one
There are definitely some lessons to be taken from the late 90's and turn of the century, and it has to do with managing real money for real clients for the long run.
Just saying, " the only thing you can say for sure is that you can't predict the market " is what a lot of advisors were telling their clients in 2000, 2001, 2002 and so on.
I can assure you that if the market really gets hammered, even for a short period, and maybe due to geopolitical reasons, you will lose some points just sounding like a buy and hold parrot. Worse, you are in the business to try to help you clients not lose money, and there is an active allocation responsibility here -at least, experience suggests that a lot of the above comments may feel like intellectual hooey if things really fall apart. Look, we all learned the basics in our CFP or finance classes, there is a behavioural aspect here.
Allreit, I question if you really manage money for clients, or have for long, because this question is as much about handling clients as it is about running money.
From a financial planning point of view, if you have a client who has enjoyed gains for the past six years or so, they have more money, are closer to being able to finance their goals, are closer to retirement, whatever. This fact alone can affect portfolio construction, versus the esoteric academic questions about market timing. I know from experience that a lot of advisors have not gone back and looked at portfolio construction from this point of view, along with a great economic recovery and the fact of life that economic cycles still exist, apparently.
The biggest thing I learned around 2000 is that in moving from 50% stocks and 50% bonds, or so, up to a higher percentage of stocks, there is an exponential increase in risk but not reward.
Has anyone here at all been trimming back to fixed positions a little, or am I crazy? My clients are plenty happy to capture two thirds of the S&P with half the risk (right now). We still have plenty of stocks to catch a rising market, but we can buy more if stocks take a plunge.
Some of this " tactical " allocation also happens inside some managed funds.
In handling client relationships, getting some input from clients helps to continuously define a clients risk profile - these are smaller adjustments, but the communication itself is educational and helps prepare us for all market conditions.
At least, it works for me.
Here's a question: your client's money has nearly doubled since 9/11.
Your client is six years closer to retirement, closer to " being there " from a financial planning point of view.
In terms of the investment portfolio, is geopolitical risk more important, less important, or the same in terms of portfolio construction ( after six years of a great economy ) - net of the portfolio withdrawal time frame consideration?
They said we were living in a new paradigm at the end of the 90s, but good old fundamentals along with things like style drift and portfolio concentration and terrorists who hate capitalism blew things up for a while. Is the world more or less complex now, and how important is thinking for yourself and your clients individual needs versus historical wisdom.
Historical wisdom (Modern Portfolio Theory) is the core, and the " tactical" allocation is really alignment with client's finanical planning considerations, but there is definitely a market performance expectation. There is a danger of imparting too much of our own view, but with the client, the right amount is really another form of diversification.
Of course, each to his own, I'm not suggesting I have a monopoly on helping clients get there.
[quote=FreeLunch]
Managed Money,
90% of my book is professionally managed too - if it wasn't, we'd both be pulling our hair out.
It's a tough market, and I can't find many "Value-looking technical charts" (if you know what I mean)
I've never been one Love buying into strength from a trader's perspective. My thing is, that now, it looks like the "trendlines" of my favorite stocks are rolling over.
I surely don't want to overanalyze things, but I enjoy it & love it. I just think the market needs to churn and consolidate for awhile...I guess. It's a tough one
[/quote]I've never traded individual stocks. I traded the S&P futures exclusively. However, I spent a lot of time with William O'Neil 20 years ago, and I am a firm believer in the CANSLIM method for anyone who would want to trade stocks.
If you can't find anything to buy, then take the summer off and let those managers try to figure it out. :)
[quote=AllREIT]
[quote=joedabrkr]
[quote=FreeLunch]
Here’s why I don’t think we’ll go much lower.
P/Es for Financials and Energy are AROUND 10
- How much Lower can THOSE sectors go?
[/quote]History tells us they can go lower, especially if the "E" starts eroding in the financials. Like if there were some major problems in the corporate debt market. We don't have anything like that developing, do we?
[/quote]
Joe, you sound like a stern bear.
Perhaps you would be interested in shares of ING Senior Income Fund? Its an income fund for especially for seniors' like yourself.
[/quote]
Funny man.
Am I a bear, or a realist? Especially when it pertains to the banks and their exposure to the current issues in the credit market.
Cyclical stocks, be they exposed to a credit cycle or economic cycle, often appear cheapest when their earnings are at peak levels.
[quote=FreeLunch]
Managed Money,
90% of my book is professionally managed too - if it wasn't, we'd both be pulling our hair out.
It's a tough market, and I can't find many "Value-looking technical charts" (if you know what I mean)
I've never been one Love buying into strength from a trader's perspective. My thing is, that now, it looks like the "trendlines" of my favorite stocks are rolling over.
I surely don't want to overanalyze things, but I enjoy it & love it. I just think the market needs to churn and consolidate for awhile...I guess. It's a tough one
[/quote]
Wait a minute!!! You told me that YOU were a money manager. What's up with that?
FreeLunch - It sounds like you have this whole market thing figured out, so I’m not sure why you are even asking anything about it. With your experience and knowledge, we should be asking you what to do next. Thanks for all of YOUR insight.
OldP
PS - In all of your experience with market downturns, how many coworkers have you seen commit suicide? It isn’t a pretty thing to experience, but having seen it, you truly have seen bear markets. Good luck sharing your knowledge.
In all of your experience with market downturns, how many coworkers have you seen commit suicide? It isn't a pretty thing to experience, but having seen it, you truly have seen bear markets. Good luck sharing your knowledge.
Old, that's horrible. And there is plenty of mental suicide. How many of us could deal with waking up next week to having half a book to manage? Maybe it just becomes partly selfish self preservation at some point. We have had a great run.
[quote=GolFA]
Just saying, " the only thing you can say for sure is
that you can’t predict the market " is what a lot of advisors were
telling their clients in 2000, 2001, 2002 and so on.
I can assure you that if the market really gets hammered, even for a short period, and maybe due to geopolitical reasons, you will lose some points just sounding like a buy and hold parrot. Worse, you are in the business to try to help you clients not lose money, and there is an active allocation responsibility here -at least, experience suggests that a lot of the above comments may feel like intellectual hooey if things really fall apart. Look, we all learned the basics in our CFP or finance classes, there is a behavioural aspect here.
Allreit, I question if you really manage money for clients, or have for long, because this question is as much about handling clients as it is about running money.
[/quote]I make it very clear to clients what my view of the future is. I don't have any, and I don't invest for the sake of any particular future, with the exception of being prepared for high inflation.
Clients understand and appreciate the honesty. Most of FA's are loathe to admit they have no clue about the markets short term direction. Using iVolatilities from options I'll construct various worst case scenarios and make sure that everyone is squared away with them before we invest.
The only way to control the behavioral aspect is to educate and clients
yourself about it, and then like Jason chain yourself to the mast of
the ship.
But that is how passive investing works, and thats the right approach
for most clients. You focus on getting your fair share of the market’s
return, but do not worry about what that return is, because you have no
influence over it.
[quote=GolFA]
In all of your experience with market
downturns, how many coworkers have you seen commit suicide? It isn’t a
pretty thing to experience, but having seen it, you truly have seen
bear markets. Good luck sharing your knowledge.
Old, that's horrible. And there is plenty of
mental suicide. How many of us could deal with waking up next week to
having half a book to manage? Maybe it just becomes partly selfish self
preservation at some point. We have had a great run.
Now we are on to something, you can't handle losses/volatility. Having not experienced any, you feel sense of anticipation for punishment. Don't project that onto other people.
If I lost half my book, I'd do very little different except start prospecting harder. But I survived with 1/2 my book back then and can do the same now.
Infact the smartest thing of all, would be if my personal investments were wholly non-correlated with the market, since my professional fortunes are. So like a good pit trader, you own nothing but T-bills for your personal account.
Different strokes, my clients and I are in a different place now. No way are we risking a 50% portfolio reduction. The upside potential sounds nice, no way are we completely going for it.
I think you and I understand and agree on the basic concepts.
Some guys take all the money off the table and go to the beach for the summer, so they can enjoy their tuna boat. Others just fish off the back porch every day. Instead of prospecting, I'll take the referrals from a smoother ride, serving mellow clients.
GOLFA
Those are some GREAT posts - VERY insightful and I think you made some fantastic points.
OldProducer - You remind me of "DEBBIE DOWNER" on Saturday Night Live. Those chumps that shot themselves during the blowup shoulda known better. They were doomed from the getgo.
To go along with what GOLFA said - experience has shown me that the best way to beat the S&P over the long term is Tactical Asset Allocation just like you say.
I am not claiming to know it all - I'm here to learn more. The second I close the door looking for new strategies and ideas is the second I quit enjoying what I do...
Ditto, constantly learning and being challenged in a meaningful way.
I would even say, it is not about beating the indexes, but capturing most of the upside of the S&P with a lot less risk - at all times - since no one can know the market timing.
And the minor tactical allocation, which is tailored to financial goals and tempered by market expectations a little, maybe half of the importance of it is to refresh the client relationship through a constant dialog about goals, risk tolerance, expectations.
Being very tight with your clients through lots of phone contact and personal interaction generates all the referrals you will need, and the idea of going out and prospecting when your own client portfolios are down 50% - come on, better to give them a little smoother ride with plenty of upside and take the referrals that come running from their friend during the next down market. Plenty come now, it is a function of contact and not performance. I realize their are different client target markets, but if you teach them not to chase performance, and then you can deliver a good return with less risk, you are underpromising and overdelivering.
Now, and I would say the past six months, would be a great time to tune in to how clients feel about what the market may do, and it may go up a couple of thousand points. Do you think it will ever be lower than it is right now? Since when do we just educate folks that equities get 10 or twelve percent over the long haul and that we need to just stay invested in them so we can beat inflation. For a lot of folks, reality lies somewhere in the middle.
I would even say, it is not about beating the indexes, but capturing most of the upside of the S&P with a lot less risk - at all times - since no one can know the market timing.
We must have a very different clientelle. I've never had a client tell me, "I'd like to capture most of the upside of the S&P with a lot less risk."
My clients say things like, "I would love to retire in 7 years" or "How am I going to send my child to college and take care of my parents at the same time."
I guess if I was a money manager the concern would be about rates of return. Instead, as a financial advisor, we keep the focus on helping clients maximize their chance to reach their goals instead of focusing on maximizing the amount of money that they have.
[quote=FreeLunch]
GOLFA
Those are some GREAT posts - VERY insightful and I think you made some fantastic points.
OldProducer - You remind me of “DEBBIE DOWNER” on Saturday Night Live. Those chumps that shot themselves during the blowup shoulda known better. They were doomed from the getgo.
To go along with what GOLFA said - experience has shown me that the best way to beat the S&P over the long term is Tactical Asset Allocation just like you say.
I am not claiming to know it all - I’m here to learn more. The second I close the door looking for new strategies and ideas is the second I quit enjoying what I do…
[/quote]That is good - comparing the reality of experience with a comedy show. As you gain experience and see a bear market, I hope you aren’t the one jumping.
Flexibility is great, but looking long-term is the way to go. Stressing over next month/quarter/whatever will not add to your success.
The best of luck to you, Slugger.
Oldp
[quote=anonymous]
I would even say, it is not about beating the indexes, but capturing most of the upside of the S&P with a lot less risk - at all times - since no one can know the market timing.
We must have a very different clientelle. I've never had a client tell me, "I'd like to capture most of the upside of the S&P with a lot less risk."
My clients say things like, "I would love to retire in 7 years" or "How am I going to send my child to college and take care of my parents at the same time."
I guess if I was a money manager the concern would be about rates of return. Instead, as a financial advisor, we keep the focus on helping clients maximize their chance to reach their goals instead of focusing on maximizing the amount of money that they have.
[/quote]
I think we agree, the clients come up with the goals, but most everyone wants to make money and not lose it.
Maximizing your net worth and and maximizing the chance you have to reach your goals are pretty much the same thing, unless you are talking about risk transfer or spending less.
Intangibles, like not being able to sleep at night because you worry about the market, require a little education for clients, or at least a core philosophy. Not saying mine is the highway, but it seems to work okay.
[quote=GolFA]
There are definitely some lessons to be taken from the late 90’s and
turn of the century, and it has to do with managing real money for real
clients for the long run.
I can assure you that if the market really gets hammered, even for a short period, and maybe due to geopolitical reasons, you will lose some points just sounding like a buy and hold parrot. Worse, you are in the business to try to help you clients not lose money, and there is an active allocation responsibility here -at least, experience suggests that a lot of the above comments may feel like intellectual hooey if things really fall apart. Look, we all learned the basics in our CFP or finance classes, there is a behavioural aspect here.
Has anyone here at all been trimming back to fixed positions a little, or am I crazy? My clients are plenty happy to capture two thirds of the S&P with half the risk (right now). We still have plenty of stocks to catch a rising market, but we can buy more if stocks take a plunge.
…[/quote]
I have been calling some of my bigger clients who I have learned over the years tend to be a little more nervous when things turn down, and as well a few who got hit in 99-02 that have made a lot since then.
For those with fee-based diversified portfolios, I’ve simply stated something along these lines. "Mr. Smith, the S&P has essentially doubled since the last major bottom. Your account is up more than 25% in the last two years. There are reasons to think there is a lot more risk in the world right now: bond market jitters, housing market slowdown, civil war in the West Bank, etc. I’m not predicting a major market correction, just suggesting that there are greater chances for it now than there was a year or two ago, and I want you to consider if we should take some action to dampen the impact on you if that were to happen…
What we can do is take that last 2 years worth of profits and put it into a GNMA unit trust. The price of the trust may fluctuate but payment of interest and principal on the bonds is guaranteed by the US government. So, if my concerns are unwarranted the worst that can happen is that the stock market continues to go up and you only earn about 5 1/2% on that pool of safer money. On the other hand if we do experience a meaningful pullback this will cushion the blow and you will have funds that you can put back into the market at lower prices."
Most people do it. I make a couple of extra bucks and they rest easier at night knowing that they’ve put some of their realized profits in a safer pocket.