Skip navigation

Ron Paul

or Register to post new content in the forum

69 RepliesJump to last post

 

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Feb 25, 2010 2:47 am

tdude - your boy Griffin thinks that 9/11 was an inside job.  Makes him a nutjob.

http://www.realityzone.com/

Feb 25, 2010 2:53 am


What BS.   ron paul is an annoying whiney fukc.





Fed chairman Bernanke simply doesn’t know Fed history as well as Ron Paul (Or the history conveniently slipped his memory). As far as Watergate, I always thought it was pretty common knowledge that the money ended up in the burglars’ hands through some pretty fishy means. Even wikipedia has part of the story:

[Watergate burglar Bernard] Barker had attempted to disguise the origin of the funds by depositing the donors’ checks into bank accounts which (though controlled by him), were located in banks outside of the United States. What Barker, Liddy, and Sloan did not know was that the complete record of all such transactions are held, after the funds cleared, for roughly six months. Barker’s use of foreign banks to deposit checks and withdraw the funds via cashier’s checks and money orders in April and May 1972 guaranteed that the banks would keep the entire transaction record at least until October and November 1972.

Wikipedia, also states:

Investigative examination of the bank records of a Miami company run byWatergate burglar Bernard Barker revealed that an account controlled by him personally had deposited, and had transferred to it (through the Federal Reserve Check Clearing System) the funds from these financial instruments.

Clearly, there were some very, very odd transactions that went down which may, or may not, have been abnormally facilitated by the Fed. Was this a normal Fed wire, or something more convoluted? My sense has always been that there was something a bit extraordinary about the way the funds went through the Fed system. It does smell, for sure, and to ask about it is not bizarre. It should be noted that the Fed chairman at the time was Arthur Burns, who would have sold his own children to a white slave ring if Nixon had asked. (In a recent report by Micahel Labeit, here at EconominPolicyJournal.com, Labeit details the speech of former Columbia University PhD student Walter Block, who during the speech reminisced about his years studying at the school ,Block specifically recalled how Arthur Burns in his class, instead of teaching, simply told stories of his dinners with Nixon.) Note, I don’t think Nixon, himself, necessarily asked Burns to help in the transfer of the funds, but Burns would very likely have responded positively to a request from a Nixon lieutenant, given his adoration of Nixon.

Here’s the late investigative reporter Sherman Skolnick reporting on the documents the Fed blocked Congress from seeing about its possible involvement with money sent to Hussein:

….in October, 1990, at the time of the Persian Gulf conflict, there was an unpublicized case in the Chicago Federal District Court (No. 90 C 6863). The Illinois Bank Commissioner sought an injunction against the Federal Reserve Board to stop them from turning over certain bank records to the House Banking Committee. The records were those of the Chicago branch of Italy’s largest [bank], Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, owned in part by the Vatican.

Called BNL, it had records of Iraqi strongman Saddam Hussein and his secret private joint business dealings with his partner, an American. A close crony of the Federal Reserve, Chicago Federal District Judge Brian Barnett Duff, ordered the return of any records from the Banking Committee, then headed by a Democrat,Rep. Henry Gonzalez (D., Texas).

The House Banking Committee was an intervening party-litigant in the controversy. Judge Duff so opposed the House Banking Committee’s efforts to get those records, that the Judge would not listen to the Committee’s attorney; did not want the attorney in the Judge’s courtroom, the Judge calling him an 800 pound gorilla showing no respect for the court.

In May, 1991, right after the War ended in the Persian Gulf, the case ended up in the Federal Appeals Court in Chicago; a court dominated by Judges tied to the major banks and cronies of the Federal Reserve.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T



From what I understand,the Illinois Bank Commissioner filed against the Fed at the request of the Fed! What were they hiding? Ron Paul’s question wasn’t bizarre, it was Chairman Bernanke’s response that was bizarre, disrespectful and out of order. It’s time for an apology by Chairman Bernanke. And let’s see those Fed records about Hussein, the Chicago branch of BNL and the Fed!

Bernanke’s response of total ignorance reminds me of the time former Treasury Secretary for Economic Policy, Phil Swagel told me, with a straight face, he didn’t know what a gold swap was.

When it serves them, these guys have very forgetful memories. Thank the heavens there are people like Ron Paul around to remind them.

UPDATE Here’s more on possible Fed involvment in the Watergate money. From David T. Beito (Via LRC):

Well, it seems that Paul may have been onto something…or at the very least raised legitimate questions that deserve investigation. A few minutes on google news produced this 1982 story from the Milwaukee Sentinel by Richard Bradee of the paper’s Washington Bureau

“Police who searched the room the Watergate burglars used found $4,200 in $100 dollar bills, all numbered in sequence. Proxmire asked the Federal Reserve Board where the money came from. As he explained in a letter to the late Rep. Wright Patman (D-Tex.), chairman of the House Banking Committee: “I got the biggest run-around [from the Federal Reserve] in years. They ducked, misled, lied, and gave me the idiot treatment.”

Feb 25, 2010 2:55 am

I consider myself pretty pragmatic, and a fairly independent thinker...and know without a doubt that a Gore presidency would have been awful.  That's it.  This is and endless debate not worth having - but is good support for EC (kindof).

Feb 25, 2010 3:00 am
Shania Twain:

[quote=mlgone] without the Fed, ML would have gone down in dec 08 and the world financial markets would have collapsed and many of us would be out of jobs.  The credit crises had what the depression didn’t…the fed and monetary controls



without the fed.......mer would not have been in trouble with the bubble????????


electoral college is dumb.

someones vote in CA or ill or where ever is potentially "worth" more

retarded [/quote]

Without the electoral college, rural areas would be completely ignored.  Candidates would focus their entire campaigning efforts in the cities since that would be the most efficient use of their time and resources (why spend an entire day trekking through the sticks to glad hand 50 dairy farmers when you can have a 2 hour televised rally in front of 20,000 at a downtown arena).  Policy platforms would be skewed to benefit urban Americans since it would be the easiest way for candidates to lock up votes.

The system isn't perfect, but relying purely on the popular vote would not make things better.
Feb 25, 2010 3:02 am

[quote=NYCTrader]

[quote=Shania Twain] [quote=mlgone] without the Fed, ML would have gone down in dec 08 and the world financial markets would have collapsed and many of us would be out of jobs. The credit crises had what the depression didn’t…the fed and monetary controls[/quote]



without the fed…mer would not have been in trouble with the bubble???





electoral college is dumb.



someones vote in CA or ill or where ever is potentially “worth” more



retarded [/quote]Without the electoral college, rural areas would be completely ignored. Candidates would focus their entire campaigning efforts in the cities since that would be the most efficient use of their time and resources (why spend an entire day trekking through the sticks to glad hand 50 dairy farmers when you can have a 2 hour televised rally in front of 20,000 at a downtown arena). Policy platforms would be skewed to benefit urban Americans since it would be the easiest way for candidates to lock up votes.The system isn’t perfect, but relying purely on the popular vote would not make things better.[/quote]





You’re right.   I did’nt think of that angle. duh



Feb 25, 2010 3:16 am

[quote=Wet_Blanket]

I consider myself pretty pragmatic, and a fairly independent thinker…and know without a doubt that a Gore presidency would have been awful.  That’s it.  This is and endless debate not worth having - but is good support for EC (kindof).

[/quote]

I disagree with you re: Gore, but agree that the EC is essential.


Feb 25, 2010 3:22 am

[quote=NYCTrader]

[quote=Wet_Blanket]

I consider myself pretty pragmatic, and a fairly independent thinker…and know without a doubt that a Gore presidency would have been awful. That’s it. This is and endless debate not worth having - but is good support for EC (kindof).

[/quote]I disagree with you re: Gore, but agree that the EC is essential.[/quote]



I cant believe what I am about to say…would Gore have been worse>?



Iraq was fukcing insane.



I was 100% behind it at the time

In hindsight it was totally wrong

waste of money and GI’s



man…did i say that
Feb 25, 2010 3:35 am

[quote=Shania Twain] [quote=NYCTrader]

[quote=Wet_Blanket]

I consider myself pretty pragmatic, and a fairly independent thinker…and know without a doubt that a Gore presidency would have been awful.  That’s it.  This is and endless debate not worth having - but is good support for EC (kindof).

[/quote]I disagree with you re: Gore, but agree that the EC is essential.[/quote]



I cant believe what I am about to say…would Gore have been worse>?



Iraq was fukcing insane.



I was 100% behind it at the time

In hindsight it was totally wrong

waste of money and GI’s



man…did i say that [/quote]

Wow Shania, props for thinking outside the box.  Good man. 


Feb 25, 2010 3:58 am

moraen…9-11 was an inside job. It was hatched by a radical element

in Paki intel using Saudi radicals. Pakistan govt caught wind of it and warned NSA. U S Govt new the location and time and Cheney ran the operation from the bunker. Goal was to allow it to happen for 3 reasons. Iraqi oil, Afghani opium and oilpipeline and to pass the Patriot bill to snoop on Americans.



Lets see…Saudis fly into buildings, USA attacts Iraq and Afghans, Starts new dept of Homeland Security (thought defense dept Army Navy etc) was for homeland security but they are empire building. Does DHS protect our borders…no they steal our toothpaste at airports and put a camera on every intersection in America…U R quite naive. Remember what Rahm said…never let a good crisis go to waste. Many naive bloggers here



:

Feb 25, 2010 1:11 pm

[quote=tdude]moraen….9-11 was an inside job. It was hatched by a radical element

in Paki intel using Saudi radicals. Pakistan govt caught wind of it and warned NSA. U S Govt new the location and time and Cheney ran the operation from the bunker. Goal was to allow it to happen for 3 reasons. Iraqi oil, Afghani opium and oilpipeline and to pass the Patriot bill to snoop on Americans.



Lets see…Saudis fly into buildings, USA attacts Iraq and Afghans, Starts new dept of Homeland Security (thought defense dept Army Navy etc) was for homeland security but they are empire building. Does DHS protect our borders…no they steal our toothpaste at airports and put a camera on every intersection in America…U R quite naive. Remember what Rahm said…never let a good crisis go to waste. Many naive bloggers here



: [/quote]

You lose any credibility you may possibly have had with that statement.  Scientists from renowned institutions and laymen (the guys who actually do controlled demo for a living) have refuted every one of the “Truthers” points.

“But it would have worked if they were using the top secret military grade thermite!”.  I never laughed so hard in my life.  An eighteen year old kid who is angry at his parents makes a film and gets experts who got their Ph.D’s from the University of Phoenix Online to back him up.

9/11 was an inside job!  I can make you 7000% on penny stocks too. 

By the way, my Dad works for DARPA, now that he’s out of the Army.  No such thing as “military grade top secret thermite”.  Clowns.


Feb 25, 2010 1:55 pm

Back on topic: Gore.  I will admit that he has done some good - and I admire what his Father did in the Senate.  I can see why he totally lost it after the 2000 elections.  When the Democrats were first picking candidates to go against Bush Sr., Gore was considered an “A” class pick.  However, Bush Sr’s approval rating was so great that the Dems didn’t want to waste any top candidates on the race - so came in “B” class Bill Clinton.  Ofcourse we all know what happened then.  So Gore had to wait 8 years for his next chance, only to come soo close to getting the presidency.  Put this defeat in context by considering what happend to his Father and you will see that this would have been “payback” for Gore (getting the presidency).

  I would have gotten fat, grown a beard, and gone into seclusion as well.  Doesn't change the fact that I think Gore is hipocrit on other issues, but I can empathize with that.
Feb 25, 2010 5:12 pm
tdude:

Bernanke needs to apologize to Ron Paul

http://www.infowars.com/fed-chairman-bernanke-should-apologize-to-ron-paul/

You do know that every single wire from banks in the US to Banks in the US goes through the Federal Reserve system right?   Because it goes through that system does not mean it originates from the fed.   If I send my friend a wire for 10,000 from Chase to his account at Bank of America it goes from Chase to the FED to BAC. The FED issues a FED REFERENCE number so that I can track where the funds ended up.   It's like saying that UPS sold guns to Al Queda because they delivered them from Cairo to Tehran (not looking into who actually MAILED them).   It's idiotic and very poor journalism.
Feb 25, 2010 5:32 pm
Moraen:

[quote=tdude]moraen….9-11 was an inside job. It was hatched by a radical element
in Paki intel using Saudi radicals. Pakistan govt caught wind of it and warned NSA. U S Govt new the location and time and Cheney ran the operation from the bunker. Goal was to allow it to happen for 3 reasons. Iraqi oil, Afghani opium and oilpipeline and to pass the Patriot bill to snoop on Americans.

Lets see…Saudis fly into buildings, USA attacts Iraq and Afghans, Starts new dept of Homeland Security (thought defense dept Army Navy etc) was for homeland security but they are empire building. Does DHS protect our borders…no they steal our toothpaste at airports and put a camera on every intersection in America…U R quite naive. Remember what Rahm said…never let a good crisis go to waste. Many naive bloggers here

: [/quote]

You lose any credibility you may possibly have had with that statement.  Scientists from renowned institutions and laymen (the guys who actually do controlled demo for a living) have refuted every one of the “Truthers” points.

“But it would have worked if they were using the top secret military grade thermite!”.  I never laughed so hard in my life.  An eighteen year old kid who is angry at his parents makes a film and gets experts who got their Ph.D’s from the University of Phoenix Online to back him up.

9/11 was an inside job!  I can make you 7000% on penny stocks too. 

By the way, my Dad works for DARPA, now that he’s out of the Army.  No such thing as “military grade top secret thermite”.  Clowns.


  Bush and 3 jews smoking havana tampas planed 911.   Everyone knows that-duh 
Feb 25, 2010 5:50 pm

[quote=Wet_Blanket]Back on topic: Gore.  I will admit that he has done some good - and I admire what his Father did in the Senate.  I can see why he totally lost it after the 2000 elections.  When the Democrats were first picking candidates to go against Bush Sr., Gore was considered an “A” class pick.  However, Bush Sr’s approval rating was so great that the Dems didn’t want to waste any top candidates on the race - so came in “B” class Bill Clinton.  Ofcourse we all know what happened then.  So Gore had to wait 8 years for his next chance, only to come soo close to getting the presidency.  Put this defeat in context by considering what happend to his Father and you will see that this would have been “payback” for Gore (getting the presidency).

  I would have gotten fat, grown a beard, and gone into seclusion as well.  Doesn't change the fact that I think Gore is hipocrit on other issues, but I can empathize with that.[/quote]

Gore was admittedly a horrible candidate (not as bad as Kerry, but pretty terrible -- now that I think of it, Dems have had some really horrendous presidential candidates in my lifetime).  Not allowing Bubba to campaign for him was a huge mistake.  And not carrying his home state was inexcusable.  
Feb 25, 2010 5:58 pm

[quote=NYCTrader] [quote=Wet_Blanket]Back on topic: Gore.  I will admit that he has done some good - and I admire what his Father did in the Senate.  I can see why he totally lost it after the 2000 elections.  When the Democrats were first picking candidates to go against Bush Sr., Gore was considered an “A” class pick.  However, Bush Sr’s approval rating was so great that the Dems didn’t want to waste any top candidates on the race - so came in “B” class Bill Clinton.  Ofcourse we all know what happened then.  So Gore had to wait 8 years for his next chance, only to come soo close to getting the presidency.  Put this defeat in context by considering what happend to his Father and you will see that this would have been “payback” for Gore (getting the presidency).

  I would have gotten fat, grown a beard, and gone into seclusion as well.  Doesn't change the fact that I think Gore is hipocrit on other issues, but I can empathize with that.[/quote]

Gore was admittedly a horrible candidate (not as bad as Kerry, but pretty terrible -- now that I think of it, Dems have had some really horrendous presidential candidates in my lifetime).  Not allowing Bubba to campaign for him was a huge mistake.  And not carrying his home state was inexcusable.  
[/quote] The problem lies in that everyone wants Capitalism on the way up and Socialism on the way down. Gore instilled zero confidence in people so they went with Bush for 8 years. Things head south and now they want 'change'. The dems could have put Gay Black Jewish Illegal Immigrant Ex-Con on the Ballot this time and won.
Feb 25, 2010 6:35 pm

Kerry was a complete Douche.  Now with the whole Edwards scandal I constantly make fun of my wife for voting for those two.  Although, with Edwards now, Kerry seems less douchey by comparison.

Feb 25, 2010 7:17 pm

Larry Craig and Mark Foley are much more upstanding than John Edwards. 

Feb 25, 2010 7:21 pm
Spud34:

Larry Craig and Mark Foley are much more upstanding than John Edwards.



Rut Row...a lib broker is in the house......
Feb 25, 2010 7:22 pm
Wet_Blanket:

Kerry was a complete Douche. Now with the whole Edwards scandal I constantly make fun of my wife for voting for those two. Although, with Edwards now, Kerry seems less douchey by comparison.



is she hot?

damn....im sorry man.   i lost my head.    

forget that question
Feb 25, 2010 7:22 pm

A friend of mine and I used to have lunch together quite often.  He provides education for defined contribution plan administrators.  We used to have conversations all of the time (arguments really).  He was a big supporter of Edwards because Andrew Young was his neighbor (literally right next to each other).  I used to tell him that Edwards was a scumbag.  When all of this broke, he stopped returning my calls. 

Larry Craig, Mark Foley, John Edwards, Newt Gingrich, Bill Clinton - all scumbags.