So you favor war and screwing the poor?

[quote=Big Easy Flood]So you favor war and screwing the poor?[/quote]

This, after you just said..."Isn't the role of a registered representative to turn client assets into commission as quickly as possible?"

[quote=Big Easy Flood]So you favor war and screwing the poor?[/quote]

How truly narrow-minded you are, BEF.

Compared with the various state lotteries, any comers are pikers.  The lottery is the most efficient tax on the poor that I've ever seen.

As to war, if you think war is a Republican idea, sit down child, and let me tell you about how the Democrats sent me to Vietnam.  (That was another war, my historically-challenged friend.) 

Hey go to the casinos after the 1st and 9th. Chhhhhaaaaaaa chinggggggggg!!!

Welfare and Social Security checks are in and the poor are cashing in… I mean loosing their rent and food money. 

Makes me laugh that people think John Kerry, Kennedy and other are more in line with their lifes then Bush. For sure their summers in Nantucket with only the finest seafood is something we all can compare to. Love how the Dems had busses going up and down New Orleans streets during the election, but forgot during the storm.  

[quote=annuity guy]I ended up near George W. Bush. [/quote]

I'm sorry

Neo-Republican. Military too. Couldn’t bring myself to vote Repub. in '04 though for someone I couldn’t see being a good tactical leader. '08’s not looking too promising either.

W sure can flex his public speaking skills though! Never seen a better orator

[quote=Naqoyqatsi] Couldn't bring myself to vote Repub. in '04 though for someone I couldn't see being a good tactical leader. '08's not looking too promising either. [/quote]

You see a "good tactical leader" (I assume you really mean strategic leader)on the Democratic side? Care to name that person?

[quote=mikebutler222]

[quote=Naqoyqatsi] Couldn’t bring myself to vote Repub. in '04 though for someone I couldn’t see being a good tactical leader. '08’s not looking too promising either. [/quote]

You see a "good tactical leader" (I assume you really mean strategic leader)on the Democratic side? Care to name that person?

Republican. Survival of the fittest!!!

[quote=Naqoyqatsi] [quote=mikebutler222]

[quote=Naqoyqatsi] Couldn't bring myself to vote Repub. in '04 though for someone I couldn't see being a good tactical leader. '08's not looking too promising either. [/quote]

You see a "good tactical leader" (I assume you really mean strategic leader)on the Democratic side? Care to name that person?

[/quote]

where in my post did i mention democrat?....just b/c i don't vote repub doesn't mean i'm going to waste a vote on dem. i'll waste it on a nobody before going down that road.
[/quote]

"A nobody"? Care to explain? While you're at it, if you wouldn't vote for a Democrat, there are quite a few GOP candidates, none of them look like your "tactical leader"?

BTW, could I ask what you have against writing so that you can be read?

[quote=mikebutler222][quote=Naqoyqatsi] [quote=mikebutler222]

[quote=Naqoyqatsi] Couldn't bring myself to vote Repub. in '04 though for someone I couldn't see being a good tactical leader. '08's not looking too promising either. [/quote]

You see a "good tactical leader" (I assume you really mean strategic leader)on the Democratic side? Care to name that person?

[/quote]

where in my post did i mention democrat?....just b/c i don't vote repub doesn't mean i'm going to waste a vote on dem. i'll waste it on a nobody before going down that road.
[/quote]

"A nobody"? Care to explain? While you're at it, if you wouldn't vote for a Democrat, there are quite a few GOP candidates, none of them look like your "tactical leader"?

BTW, could I ask what you have against writing so that you can be read?

[quote=Naqoyqatsi] [quote=mikebutler222][quote=Naqoyqatsi] [quote=mikebutler222]

[quote=Naqoyqatsi] Couldn't bring myself to vote Repub. in '04 though for someone I couldn't see being a good tactical leader. '08's not looking too promising either. [/quote]

You see a "good tactical leader" (I assume you really mean strategic leader)on the Democratic side? Care to name that person?

[/quote]

where in my post did i mention democrat?....just b/c i don't vote repub doesn't mean i'm going to waste a vote on dem. i'll waste it on a nobody before going down that road.
[/quote]

"A nobody"? Care to explain? While you're at it, if you wouldn't vote for a Democrat, there are quite a few GOP candidates, none of them look like your "tactical leader"?

BTW, could I ask what you have against writing so that you can be read?

[/quote]

here...
let...
me...slow...down..........so you can......understand.....

who forged your transcript anyway? sounds like you'd be better off as an english professor. critiquing my writing. you're about as lame as the other guys here making feeble attempts to hit below the belt.

anyway...to answer your question; ahhh nevermind. Your not even worth my time. LOL
[/quote]

Go away, john kerry lover.

oh bitter bobby. there you go being all clever again. getting all involved and what not. tagging in for your buddy mike. how cute!

i knew you, of all others on this site, would be especially sensitive to being called lame. your response came sooner than expected.

stay clever bro!

[quote=Naqoyqatsi]oh bitter bobby. there you go being all clever again. getting all involved and what not. tagging in for your buddy mike. how cute!

i knew you, of all others on this site, would be especially sensitive to being called lame. your response came sooner than expected.

stay clever bro!
[/quote]

Actually, I've always thought mike was one of the biggest idiots on this board. You've ruined that for me, hillary boy.

[quote=Bobby Hull][quote=Naqoyqatsi] [quote=mikebutler222][quote=Naqoyqatsi] [quote=mikebutler222]

[quote=Naqoyqatsi] Couldn't bring myself to vote Repub. in '04 though for someone I couldn't see being a good tactical leader. '08's not looking too promising either. [/quote]

You see a "good tactical leader" (I assume you really mean strategic leader)on the Democratic side? Care to name that person?

[/quote]

where in my post did i mention democrat?....just b/c i don't vote repub doesn't mean i'm going to waste a vote on dem. i'll waste it on a nobody before going down that road.
[/quote]

"A nobody"? Care to explain? While you're at it, if you wouldn't vote for a Democrat, there are quite a few GOP candidates, none of them look like your "tactical leader"?

BTW, could I ask what you have against writing so that you can be read?

[/quote]

here...
let...
me...slow...down..........so you can......understand.....

who forged your transcript anyway? sounds like you'd be better off as an english professor. critiquing my writing. you're about as lame as the other guys here making feeble attempts to hit below the belt.

anyway...to answer your question; ahhh nevermind. Your not even worth my time. LOL
[/quote]

Go away, john kerry lover.

[/quote]

That's a lot of quotes in one.  I am not sure how to respond.

[quote=Mario]

ATTENTION

THE TRUE POINT OF AN ARGUMENT IS TO GET THE OTHER PERSON TO SEE YOUR SIDE THROUGH THOUGHT PROVOKING COMMENTS.  MOST OF THE PEOPLE ON THIS TOPIC ARE TAKING SHOTS AT EACH OTHER. THIS ONLY PUTS PEOPLE ON DEFENSE AND MAKES THIER MIND CLOSE UP EVEN MORE.

ME BEING A DEMOCRAT WOULD TRY TO POINT OUT THAT IN TRUE ECONOMIC THEORY THE TAXES SHOULD HAVE DECREASED.  BUT MAYBE THEY COULD HAVE BEEN SPENT ON SOMETHING SUCH AS EDUCATION THAT WOULD MAKE OUR CONTRY STRONGER IN THE FUTURE RATHER THAN GOING INTO IRAQ.  TO ME, SURE ITS WITH HINDSITE, THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN MUCH SMARTER. 

THEN A REBUPLICAN WILL TELL ME THAT CLINTON SAID THE SAME THING AND BLAIR AND RUSSIA ETC.  MY RESPONSE WOULD BE THAT AFTER 9-11 THINGS CHANGED.  WE NO LONGER HAD SUDAM AS OUR #1 MAN BUT NOW BIN LADEN.  WE STILL DO NOT KNOW WHERE HE IS, BUT WE ENDED UP WITH A GUY WHO DOES NOT HAVE ANYTHING THAT WE ACCUSED HIM OF.

THEN THE OLD "WE ARE SAFER W/O SUDAM" LINE.  NOW THIS IS TRUE, BUT NOT REALLY THE POINT.  IF WE WERE TO GO AFTER EVERYPERSON THAT WOULD MAKE US SAFER I THINK THAT KIM JONG YIEL*(I KNOW THAT I AM MISPELLING THESE NAMES) WOULD HAVE BEEN A BETTER TARGET.  JUST BASED ON THE FACT THAT HE TELLS US WITH NO FEAR THAT HE HAS WMD'S.  SO REALLY THIS LINE DOES NOT WORK.

BOTTOM LINE BUSH, IMO, WILL NOT BE REMEMBERED FOR GREATNESS.  WITH IRAQ AND SOCIAL SECURITY GOING POORLY, WHICH ARE THE TWO THINGS THAT HE WILL BE KNOW FOR THE BEST, IT SEEMS TO ME THAT HE WILL NOT BE ANOTHER REAGAN FOR THE REPUBLICANS.

NOW I FIND IT HARD TO REASONABLY ARGUE WITH MOST PEOPLE ON THIS FORUM....JUST READ MOST THE COMMENTS ABOVE, TOTALY BASHING AND NOT REALLY CONCERED WITH ISSUES JUST TALKING POINTS FROM DEMS AND REPLYING WITH TALKING POINTS OF REPS. IN THE END THAT IS WHAT IS MISSING IN POLOTICS.  BOTH PARTIES HAVE DISCOVERED THAT TALKING POINTS AND BASHING WORK SO WELL THAT THEY STOPED ACTUALLY TALKING.  I AM NOT TRYING TO BASH BUSH BUT CAN HE COMPARE INTULLECTUALY WITH PAST PRESIDENTS LIKE CLINTON, REAGAN, CARTER, OR EVEN HIS FATHER.  WETHER YOU WERE A DEM OR REP YOU STILL HAD RESPECT FOR THEM.  WHERE DID THAT GO?  WHERE DID THE UNITY AFTER 9-11 GO?

IF I WERE TO SEE A PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE WHERE THEY WERE FREE TO ACTUALLY DEBATE, LIKE A COLLEGE OR H.S., I WOULD THINK THAT WE WOULD SEE THAT OUR PRESIDENTS BEGAN TO BE GREATER LIKE THEY WERE IN THE PAST.  POLITICS ARE BAD FOR AMERICA BUT THE WAY THE SYSTEM IS RIGHT NOW THAT WHAT IT IS ALL ABOUT.

[/quote]

If you were really a Democrat, you would've taken the CAPS LOCK off and posted in lower case like every body else commy

[quote=FreeLunch][quote=Mario]

ATTENTION

THE TRUE POINT OF AN ARGUMENT IS TO GET THE OTHER PERSON TO SEE YOUR SIDE THROUGH THOUGHT PROVOKING COMMENTS.  MOST OF THE PEOPLE ON THIS TOPIC ARE TAKING SHOTS AT EACH OTHER. THIS ONLY PUTS PEOPLE ON DEFENSE AND MAKES THIER MIND CLOSE UP EVEN MORE.

ME BEING A DEMOCRAT WOULD TRY TO POINT OUT THAT IN TRUE ECONOMIC THEORY THE TAXES SHOULD HAVE DECREASED.  BUT MAYBE THEY COULD HAVE BEEN SPENT ON SOMETHING SUCH AS EDUCATION THAT WOULD MAKE OUR CONTRY STRONGER IN THE FUTURE RATHER THAN GOING INTO IRAQ.  TO ME, SURE ITS WITH HINDSITE, THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN MUCH SMARTER. 

THEN A REBUPLICAN WILL TELL ME THAT CLINTON SAID THE SAME THING AND BLAIR AND RUSSIA ETC.  MY RESPONSE WOULD BE THAT AFTER 9-11 THINGS CHANGED.  WE NO LONGER HAD SUDAM AS OUR #1 MAN BUT NOW BIN LADEN.  WE STILL DO NOT KNOW WHERE HE IS, BUT WE ENDED UP WITH A GUY WHO DOES NOT HAVE ANYTHING THAT WE ACCUSED HIM OF.

THEN THE OLD "WE ARE SAFER W/O SUDAM" LINE.  NOW THIS IS TRUE, BUT NOT REALLY THE POINT.  IF WE WERE TO GO AFTER EVERYPERSON THAT WOULD MAKE US SAFER I THINK THAT KIM JONG YIEL*(I KNOW THAT I AM MISPELLING THESE NAMES) WOULD HAVE BEEN A BETTER TARGET.  JUST BASED ON THE FACT THAT HE TELLS US WITH NO FEAR THAT HE HAS WMD'S.  SO REALLY THIS LINE DOES NOT WORK.

BOTTOM LINE BUSH, IMO, WILL NOT BE REMEMBERED FOR GREATNESS.  WITH IRAQ AND SOCIAL SECURITY GOING POORLY, WHICH ARE THE TWO THINGS THAT HE WILL BE KNOW FOR THE BEST, IT SEEMS TO ME THAT HE WILL NOT BE ANOTHER REAGAN FOR THE REPUBLICANS.

NOW I FIND IT HARD TO REASONABLY ARGUE WITH MOST PEOPLE ON THIS FORUM....JUST READ MOST THE COMMENTS ABOVE, TOTALY BASHING AND NOT REALLY CONCERED WITH ISSUES JUST TALKING POINTS FROM DEMS AND REPLYING WITH TALKING POINTS OF REPS. IN THE END THAT IS WHAT IS MISSING IN POLOTICS.  BOTH PARTIES HAVE DISCOVERED THAT TALKING POINTS AND BASHING WORK SO WELL THAT THEY STOPED ACTUALLY TALKING.  I AM NOT TRYING TO BASH BUSH BUT CAN HE COMPARE INTULLECTUALY WITH PAST PRESIDENTS LIKE CLINTON, REAGAN, CARTER, OR EVEN HIS FATHER.  WETHER YOU WERE A DEM OR REP YOU STILL HAD RESPECT FOR THEM.  WHERE DID THAT GO?  WHERE DID THE UNITY AFTER 9-11 GO?

IF I WERE TO SEE A PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE WHERE THEY WERE FREE TO ACTUALLY DEBATE, LIKE A COLLEGE OR H.S., I WOULD THINK THAT WE WOULD SEE THAT OUR PRESIDENTS BEGAN TO BE GREATER LIKE THEY WERE IN THE PAST.  POLITICS ARE BAD FOR AMERICA BUT THE WAY THE SYSTEM IS RIGHT NOW THAT WHAT IT IS ALL ABOUT.

[/quote]

If you were really a Democrat, you would've taken the CAPS LOCK off and posted in lower case like every body else commy

[/quote]

Democraps ARE commies, you knucklehead!

Hillary Boy. chuckle
Here’s what sad…and funny, but more sad. A “senior member” still hangin’ out with the newbies. Of course, if you can’t hang with the big dogs, well, you just can’t hang. I’d be bitter too…

But anyway, I see you are man of logic. You deduce that, since I did not vote for ultra-intelligent Bush, that I must have voted for coward Kerry. Using the same line of thinking as you, here are my assumptions:

A. You are a closet homosexual
B. You are a closet pedophile
C. Both A and B minus being in the closet

Both seem to be the trend lately in the GOP. For you, I think “A” fits your profile best.

Cheers for now. I’ll take your worthless reply tomorrow…oh, and give a shout out to your boy Ted Haggard next time you meet.

[quote=Naqoyqatsi]Hillary Boy. *chuckle*
Here's what sad...and funny, but more sad. A "senior member" still hangin' out with the newbies. Of course, if you can't hang with the big dogs, well, you just can't hang. I'd be bitter too...

But anyway, I see you are man of logic. You deduce that, since I did not vote for ultra-intelligent Bush, that I must have voted for coward Kerry. Using the same line of thinking as you, here are my assumptions:

A. You are a closet homosexual
B. You are a closet pedophile
C. Both A and B minus being in the closet

Both seem to be the trend lately in the GOP. For you, I think "A" fits your profile best.

Cheers for now. I'll take your worthless reply tomorrow...oh, and give a shout out to your boy Ted Haggard next time you meet.
[/quote]

Terrifying.  You are so Democrat it is Scary.  Hillary Vs. Obama.

I'd rather see Ms. Beavis Vs. Butthead.

IF YOU'VE EVEN CONSIDERED voting for Hillary = you are a Severe Idiot.

[quote=Naqoyqatsi]Hillary Boy. *chuckle*
Here's what sad...and funny, but more sad. A "senior member" still hangin' out with the newbies. Of course, if you can't hang with the big dogs, well, you just can't hang. I'd be bitter too...

But anyway, I see you are man of logic. You deduce that, since I did not vote for ultra-intelligent Bush, that I must have voted for coward Kerry. Using the same line of thinking as you, here are my assumptions:

A. You are a closet homosexual
B. You are a closet pedophile
C. Both A and B minus being in the closet

Both seem to be the trend lately in the GOP. For you, I think "A" fits your profile best.

Cheers for now. I'll take your worthless reply tomorrow...oh, and give a shout out to your boy Ted Haggard next time you meet.
[/quote]

You're probably right.