Skip navigation

Disclaimers vs. ERISA

In the recent case of Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont Savings and Investment Plan et al.,1 the U.S. Supreme Court again confirmed its longstanding policy that qualified retirement plans (QRPs) must be administered in accordance with the plan documents (and without regard to extraneous documents or contravening state laws). Though the opinion is encouraging with respect to disclaimers of QRP

In the recent case of Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont Savings and Investment Plan et al.,1 the U.S. Supreme Court again confirmed its longstanding policy that qualified retirement plans (QRPs) must be administered in accordance with the plan documents (and without regard to extraneous documents or contravening state laws). Though the opinion is encouraging with respect to disclaimers of QRP benefits, estate planners still must proceed with caution regarding such disclaimers.

All access premium subscription

Please Log in if you are currently a Trusts & Estates subscriber.


If you are interested in becoming a subscriber with unlimited article access, please select Subscription Options below.


Questions about your account or how to access content?


Contact: [email protected]

Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish