For a growing number of investors, actively managed mutual funds seem like dinosaurs. The active funds are expensive and lag the benchmarks, say proponents of passive investing. Confronted with a top-performing active manager, the critics shrug and argue that the great returns could be due to luck. Just because an active manager shined for the past five years does not mean that he will succeed in the future.
Register to view the full article
Sign up for a FREE membership to WealthManagement.com – the leading provider of insights and intelligence for investment advisors
2 comments
Hide comments