Sponsored By

What Clients Should Know About Their Family TrustWhat Clients Should Know About Their Family Trust

It’s critical that the couple understand and adhere to the rules governing their acts.

Ryan Szczepanik, Principal

June 19, 2019

3 Min Read
holding hands wedding rings
nazileom/iStock/Getty Images Plus

Married clients often establish a Family Trust to control the disposition of their assets. It’s critical that the couple adhere to the rules governing their acts in that context.

The Basics

The Family Trust typically will provide that on the first spouse to pass, the trustee must divide the assets into two sub-trusts: a sub-trust containing the surviving spouse’s separate property and one-half community property (Sub-Trust A); and a sub-trust containing the deceased spouse’s separate property and one-half community property (Sub-Trust B). The Family Trust typically will provide that the surviving spouse will serve as the trustee of both sub-trusts. The Family Trust typically will provide that the surviving spouse can modify the terms of Sub-Trust A, but can’t modify the named beneficiaries and other terms of Sub-Trust B. 

Separate property is property owned by either spouse before marriage; property acquired during marriage by gift or inheritance; property acquired during marriage with the expenditure of separate funds; and income derived from separate property. Community property is property other than separate property acquired by either spouse during marriage, such as salaries and income from community assets. 

Transmuting Property

During their lifetimes, clients may transmute (that is, change the form of) property, whether from separate to community, from community to separate or from the separate property of one spouse to the separate property of the other spouse. A transmutation isn’t valid unless made in writing by an express declaration that’s made, joined in, consented to or accepted by the spouse whose interest in the property is adversely affected. The writing must contain language that expressly states that the characterization or ownership of the property is being changed.

Even when the transmutation requirements are met, if one spouse gains an advantage over the other spouse in the transaction, a presumption arises that the transaction resulted from undue influence. If challenged, the advantaged spouse must show that the other spouse acted freely and voluntarily, with full knowledge of the facts and with a complete understanding of the transaction’s effect.

Trustee’s Duties

A challenge is more likely when the deceased spouse named as beneficiaries of Sub-Trust B individuals other than the spouses’ children, for example, the deceased spouse’s children from a prior marriage. The surviving spouse, as trustee, must comply with his trustee duties, which include a duty: of loyalty to the beneficiaries, to deal impartially with them, to avoid conflicts of interest, to preserve trust property, to keep trust property separate from non-trust property and to enforce claims that are part of the trust property. The trustee is subject to the prudent investor rule, which requires the trustee to devise a strategy for investment of the assets having risk and return objectives reasonably suited to the trust. The trustee also has a duty to diversify the trust investments unless, under the circumstances, it’s prudent not to do so.

Establishing a family trusts is not a fire and forget solution. It requires the assumption of a great deal of responsibility, fiduciary and otherwise. Ensure your clients fully understand what's required of them before setting up such a vehicle.

About the Author

Ryan Szczepanik

Principal, Hartog, Baer & Hand

Ryan J. Szczepanik is a Principal with HARTOG, BAER & HAND in Orinda, Calif. Mr. Szczepanik is a California Certified Specialist in Estate Planning, Trust and Probate Law. He focuses his practice on trust and estate litigation.

After graduating law school in 2003, Mr. Szczepanik spent nine years at large law firms litigating business disputes in addition to trust and estate matters. From 2006 to 2012, Mr. Szczepanik was a litigation attorney in the Atlanta and San Francisco offices of King & Spalding LLP, a large international firm. He has been admitted to practice in California, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey.

Mr. Szczepanik presented on “Private Judge Trust Litigation Trials” at the East Bay Trusts & Estates Lawyers’ April 2015 Litigation Committee meeting; the San Francisco Bar Association’s Trust & Estate Litigation Section November 2015 CLE program; and the Silicon Valley Bar Association’s April 2016 Education Committee meeting. He also presented on “Statutes of Limitation and Creditors’ Claims” at the East Bay Trusts & Estates Lawyers’ September 2013 Probate Litigation Boot Camp.

He is an author of trust and probate chapters in Matthew Bender’s publication California Forms of Pleading & Practice. He authored the article “Forging into Uncharted Territory with the Law on Abuse of Dependent Adults” in the April 2014 edition of the Contra Costa Lawyer Magazine. Mr. Szczepanik has published numerous articles on alternative dispute resolution issues.

Mr. Szczepanik is the Chair of the Litigation and Mediation Committee of the East Bay Trusts & Estates Lawyers. He is a Member of the Litigation Subcommittee of the Trusts and Estates Section of the State Bar of California.

Mr. Szczepanik actively volunteers in his local community. He serves as a mentor in the YMCA’s Building Futures Program.

Mr. Szczepanik is a 1999 graduate of Amherst College and a 2003 graduate of Emory Law School. While a law student, he received the Dean’s Award for Trusts & Estates.

You May Also Like