data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d103a/d103ababcb68d7a75c520ab815be6eef7de45779" alt="Freiberg -GettyImages-1021303764.jpg Freiberg -GettyImages-1021303764.jpg"
Fiduciaries generally have broad powers to administer and manage a trust or estate and are typically compensated for their service. But what happens when a fiduciary is uncertain about how to proceed and is reluctant to make a decision out of fear that any wrong move might spur litigation? The fiduciary’s, or its attorney’s, first instinct might be to seek advice and direction from a court. After all, there’s no better assurance that the fiduciary has complied with its duties than a court’s imprimatur.
But while the desire to obtain authorization from a court is certainly understandable—and if granted, it will give the fiduciary the sought-after peace of mind—it might not be attainable in states, like New York, that want fiduciaries to ma...
Unlock All Access Premium Subscription
Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!
Already Subscribed?
About the Authors
You May Also Like