Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

To Seek a Court’s Advice and Direction, or Not to Seek, That is the QuestionTo Seek a Court’s Advice and Direction, or Not to Seek, That is the Question

A review of the varying approaches taken in directing fiduciaries.

14 Min Read
Freiberg -GettyImages-1021303764.jpg

Fiduciaries generally have broad powers to administer and manage a trust or estate and are typically compensated for their service. But what happens when a fiduciary is uncertain about how to proceed and is reluctant to make a decision out of fear that any wrong move might spur litigation? The fiduciary’s, or its attorney’s, first instinct might be to seek advice and direction from a court. After all, there’s no better assurance that the fiduciary has complied with its duties than a court’s imprimatur.

But while the desire to obtain authorization from a court is certainly understandable—and if granted, it will give the fiduciary the sought-after peace of mind—it might not be attainable in states, like New York, that want fiduciaries to ma...

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?

About the Authors

Jay W. Freiberg

Partner, Elman Freiberg PLLC

Jay W. Freiberg is a partner at Elman Freiberg PLLC in New York City.

Yelena Rapoport

Counsel, Elman Freiberg PLLC

Yelena Rapoport is counsel at Elman Freiberg PLLC in New York City.

You May Also Like