![Wealth Management Magazine Wealth Management Magazine](https://eu-images.contentstack.com/v3/assets/bltabaa95ef14172c61/bltb2b97c8dc5044c5e/67239d7ce88bac59d13a489e/WMMagLogo.jpg?width=700&auto=webp&quality=80&disable=upscale)
Spitzer Defends UBS Brokers—No, SeriouslySpitzer Defends UBS Brokers—No, Seriously
Eliot Spitzer announced in mid-December that he thinks the $89 million overtime settlement that UBS agreed to in February 2006 is unfairly distributed, and he’s asking a Northern California District Court to reject the proposed settlement amount.
January 1, 2007
Halah Touryalai
Eliot Spitzer announced in mid-December that he thinks the $89 million overtime settlement that UBS agreed to in February 2006 is unfairly distributed, and he’s asking a Northern California District Court to reject the proposed settlement amount. In a memorandum to the court, Spitzer wrote that New York-based UBS brokers will receive just $11.3 million of the proposed $89 million, while California brokers get a windfall $44 million. A settlement hearing is scheduled for Jan. 19.