Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

Adjusting IRAs' Investment ReturnsAdjusting IRAs' Investment Returns

In Revenue Ruling 2006-26,1 the Internal Revenue Service focused on two fiduciary accounting rules involving payments from an individual retirement account (IRA) to a trust intended to qualify for the estate tax marital deduction. Both rules came from the latest version of the Uniform Principal and Income Act published in 1997 and amended in 2000 (UPIA).2 The revenue ruling dealt with the rules' impact

David S. Sennett, Independent IRA Consultant

February 1, 2008

16 Min Read
Wealth Management logo in a gray background | Wealth Management

David S. Sennett

In Revenue Ruling 2006-26,1 the Internal Revenue Service focused on two fiduciary accounting rules involving payments from an individual retirement account (IRA) to a trust intended to qualify for the estate tax marital deduction. Both rules came from the latest version of the Uniform Principal and Income Act published in 1997 and amended in 2000 (UPIA).2 The revenue ruling dealt with the rules' impact on the surviving spouse's annual entitlement to all of the IRA's net accounting income (sometimes referred to as “income”), a key requirement for obtaining the qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) marital deduction.

The IRS dismissed reliance on the first rule, UPIA Section 409, as failing to satisfy the surviving s...

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?

About the Author

David S. Sennett

Independent IRA Consultant

David S. Sennett is an independent IRA consultant in Creve Coeur, Missouri. For over a decade, he dealt with IRA issues as a risk manager for Wachovia and Wells Fargo Banks.