Sponsored By

These Six States Have Pursued Fiduciary RulesThese Six States Have Pursued Fiduciary Rules

Checking in on the status of state attempts to create their own fiduciary standards.

Diana Britton, Managing Editor

October 23, 2018

7 Slides
American flag

Already have an account?

Copyright Jared C. Tilton, Getty Images

When an appeals court vacated the Department of Labor’s fiduciary rule, many states decided to take the fiduciary issue into their own hands. Then, the Securities and Exchange Commission put forth a rule package that would require brokers and advisors to act in their clients’ best interests, falling short of what consumer advocates would call a “fiduciary rule.” 

Many states and consumer advocacy groups aren’t happy with the federal government’s efforts to create a standard of care for brokers and advisors, so they’ve taken action on a local level. Some states’ legislation have already gone through; others remain stalled.

William Galvin, secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, has been a vocal proponent for a fiduciary standard. But he’s currently waiting to see the SEC’s final rule before taking action on a state level.

And the DOL recently put it on the schedule to revisit its fiduciary rule in fall 2019. 

Here’s where some of the states’ efforts stand.

 

About the Author

Diana Britton

Managing Editor, WealthManagement.com

Diana Britton is the Managing Editor of WealthManagement.com, covering covering independent broker/dealers and RIAs from all angles. She's also the host of The Healthy Advisor, a podcast focused on advisor health and wellbeing. A native of Los Angeles, she now lives in Rocklin, Calif.