Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

Estate of Jensen v. CommissionerEstate of Jensen v. Commissioner

Tax Court holds that the discount for the tax on built-in gains should take into account both future appreciation on property and the present value discount for the projected capital gains tax In Estate of Jensen v. Comm'r, T.C. Memo 2010-182 (Aug. 10, 2010), the question before the Tax Court was how to determine the discount for the built-in capital gains tax for property owned by a C corporation.

January 1, 2011

4 Min Read
Wealth Management logo in a gray background | Wealth Management

Tax Court holds that the discount for the tax on built-in gains should take into account both future appreciation on property and the present value discount for the projected capital gains tax

In Estate of Jensen v. Comm'r, T.C. Memo 2010-182 (Aug. 10, 2010), the question before the Tax Court was how to determine the discount for the built-in capital gains tax for property owned by a C corporation. Both the taxpayer and the Internal Revenue Service agreed that a discount for built-in capital gains was appropriate because a willing buyer would consider the built-in capital gains liability and demand a discounted purchase price. See Treasury Regulations Section 20.2031-1(b) (estate tax valuation is determined by a willing buyer/willing sell...

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?