“I have explored this area pretty heavily and still find a lot to be desired,” said Newell, who opened his practice in February. “Larger asset managers have tried to make these accessible through liquid options like open-ended mutual funds. The problem is the performance stinks on many of them for long stretches of time, with pops of strong performance. On their face they sound good, especially this year. However, the problem is being able to successfully and consistently predict that performance. Which we all know is nearly impossible."
“Recently, I have been looking at nonliquid options and these seem to be more attractive from a potential return perspective,” he said, pointing out that illiquid options still carry a significant loss of principal risk, can require much higher minimum investments and often require a years-long capital commitment.
“So, yes, in theory, alternatives sound great. The silver bullet still eludes us though, and investors need to walk into these with a high level of caution. The question always returns to what is the client trying to accomplish and how do we position them to have a high degree of confidence in their ability to do that. Alternatives might help, but they may not.”