There isn't a whole lot robotic about passive investing. In fact, it involves quite a lot of human decision making.

Keep your politics out of your portfolio.

This year, investors have poured a combined $2.4 billion into three exchange-traded funds focused on banks.

A new Dalbar study shows that active investments produce superior investor returns over long time periods, while passive investments have better investor returns over shorter periods.

Fidelity announced the reduction of retail commissions this morning, and Charles Schwab quickly followed suit.

Inspire Investing looks to undercut fees of other faith-based funds.

The line blurs between active and passive.

Many investors have reaped the benefits of low-fee passive index investing, but can there be too much of a good thing?

There really is no competition between ETFs and mutual funds, the majority of advisors expect Trump-driven volatility and E*Trade adds more index funds to its platform.

The popularity and, perhaps, utility of beta is being eclipsed. That’s led ETF issuers recently to go active, trying to beat the broader market. Does it work, and at what cost?