Sponsored By

Offshore Asset Protection Strategies Amid Corporate Transparency Act UncertaintyOffshore Asset Protection Strategies Amid Corporate Transparency Act Uncertainty

The recent turbulence surrounding the Corporate Transparency Act requires careful investment into financial stability to ensure companies remain compliant and prepared for the future.

Blake Harris, Founding Principal, Blake Harris Law

February 3, 2025

4 Min Read
Cook Island offshort trusts
The Cook Islands is one country where offshore trusts offer investors benefits.chameleonseye/iStock/Getty Images Plus

The Corporate Transparency Act has experienced significant turbulence since its inception in 2021, highlighting growing instability within the U.S. financial system. In what is described as ‘legal ping-pong,’ the Fifth Circuit paused the CTA in December 2024 because of questions around its constitutionality. The CTA had originally asked that companies meet the Jan. 1, 2025, deadline to file beneficial ownership information reports, but now BOIs are on hold and still being litigated. 

As legal requirements for financial transparency continue to fluctuate and change, it has become increasingly important for companies to understand the intersection between offshore planning and regulatory compliance. 

The Current State of the CTA

The implementation of the CTA has faced numerous legal challenges. When the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reinstated the nationwide preliminary injunction against the enforcement of the CTA, reporting companies were no longer required to file their BOI reports with FinCEN, nor are they currently subject to liabilities for failing to file while the injunction is in place. 

The Department of Justice has appealed to the Supreme Court to lift this injunction, and arguments are scheduled for March 25, 2025. These changes have introduced no small measure of legal uncertainty and triggered many companies to explore offshore options to protect their assets while ensuring they remain compliant with these evolving regulations. 

Related:The Corporate Transparency Act Whipsaw Continues

Why Consider Offshore Assets?

Offshore asset protection has emerged as a legitimate strategy for companies and individuals to shield their wealth from several domestic risks, including business disputes, lawsuits, divorce proceedings and judgment creditor collections. These offshore trusts allow individuals and organizations to maintain control over their assets within a well-structured and legally secure framework. 

Unlike domestic assets and trusts, offshore trusts in countries such as the Cook Islands, Nevis and Belize offer investors several benefits, including robust privacy laws, financial services and reliable legal frameworks. The Cook Islands, for example, has the International Trusts Act of 1984, which provides trusted protection against foreign claimants and credits and demands a higher burden of proof for fraudulent conveyance claims compared to the United States.

Another reason why offshore assets, particularly in the Cook Islands, are beneficial is that the region offers enhanced confidentiality protection, which helps maintain the privacy of trust deeds and assets while also ensuring reporting compliance. However, it is worth noting that while trusts in the Cook Islands are exempt from local taxation requirements, investors will need to abide by the tax regulations from their home jurisdiction. So, if your clients invest in an offshore trust, they will need to be compliant with both U.S. and international laws when it comes to managing taxation and payments. 

That said, high net worth individuals and companies can benefit significantly from the protections an offshore trust provides. In the current legal climate, these include:

  • Reducing Risk—With millions of lawsuits filed in the United States every year, an offshore trust allows companies to build up an additional wall of protection against domestic legal challenges.

  • Cost Savings—The costs of defending against these lawsuits can be substantial. The Swiss Re Institute found that the cost of litigation has increased liability claims in the U.S. by 57% over the past 10 years. 

  • Jurisdictional Benefits—When plaintiffs attempt to access assets in offshore trusts, they face several obstacles, including having to hire foreign counsel and navigate a different and unfriendly legal system.

Develop a Sound Investment Strategy

The regulatory landscape will continue to evolve, not just throughout the course of 2025 as the CTA faces new arguments and scheduling, but well beyond. Wealthholders should invest in a solid, future-proof wealth strategy. An offshore trust is one such strategy but there are several key factors that need to be considered from the outset:

  1. Timing is everything. The key to a successful asset protection strategy is to set everything up before any threat of litigation. 

  2. Compliance is essential. Proper reporting of their trust to the various government entities is critical.

  3. Professional expertise. Making the move to offshore trusts to protect assets and prepare for regulatory shifts must be done with due consideration of legal, regulatory and financial requirements. An experienced law firm familiar with both domestic regulations and international trust law is essential to ensure your clients’ portfolio is developed as part of a comprehensive protection strategy. 

Looking Ahead: Building for Resilience

The uncertainty surrounding the implementation of the CTA underscores the importance of creating a diversified asset protection strategy. Offshore trusts are just one part of the puzzle—they offer significant advantages, but they should be part of a broader wealth protection plan that addresses current regulations and potential changes to these regulations. 

While it is true that smart money is moving outside of the U.S., this movement must be executed with careful consideration of regulations and compliance. The goal is to ensure that your clients build reliable and resilient protective structures that ensure they benefit from flexibility, asset protection and privacy without compromising your profile and reputation. 

The ongoing flux with regard to the CTA is both a challenge and an opportunity. It is a chance to explore offshore options and balance asset protection while maintaining readiness for the potential implementation of the CTA. It allows clients to develop a resilient asset protection strategy that fits their business, wealth profile and strategic vision, and that will help them to protect their assets in a way that will withstand legal challenges and regulatory changes. 

About the Author

Blake Harris

Founding Principal, Blake Harris Law, Blake Harris Law

Blake Harris is the founding principal at Blake Harris Law, where he assists clients throughout the world with asset protection.

Blake Harris Law encompasses a wide range of services including Asset Protection, Offshore Asset Protection, Cook Islands Trusts, Domestic Asset Protection, Crypto Asset Protection, Nevis Trusts, and Belize Trusts.