Sponsored By

OFAC Warns of Potential Sanctions From Dealing in High-Value ArtworkOFAC Warns of Potential Sanctions From Dealing in High-Value Artwork

Take particular caution when dealing with works worth more than $100,000.

Georges Lederman, Special Counsel

November 11, 2020

2 Min Read
And Warhol art dollar signs
Mary Turner/Getty Images News/Getty Images

The U.S. Department of the Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued on Oct. 30, 2020, and released on Nov. 2, 2020, the advisory to art market participants, highlighting the risk of incurring penalties stemming from dealings in high-value artwork associated with blocked persons and entities. This advisory comes on the heels of the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Investigations’ report issued on July 29, 2020, which demonstrated the facility with which foreign bad actors are able to evade OFAC sanctions and engage in money laundering through art market purchases.

The government usually takes this step—issuing a warning—as a precursor to embarking on some sort of action so that a target can’t later complain that it wasn’t put on notice of the risks associated with violating a sanction. This is all the more important as a violation of OFAC regulations is a strict liability offense: You don’t have to know that the person or entity with whom you are dealing either directly or indirectly through an intermediary has been blocked or sanctioned for you to be found to have violated the sanction imposed.

The advisory has provided us with an interesting piece of information. Footnote 2 on the first page of the advisory states:

“For the purposes of this advisory, when considering whether an item is “high-value artwork,” OFAC would urge particular caution when dealing with artwork with an estimated market value of more than $100,000.”

Related:Book Review: Art Law

Potential Monetary Threshold for Penalties

Clients should be advised that the government will focus on some sort of monetary threshold when considering whether to impose monetary penalties for violating sanctions. This may be it. The same is true with the Bank Secrecy Act (which imposes on financial institutions the requirement to file reports of cash transactions exceeding $10,000), some of whose provisions will likely be incorporated in the mandatory AML protocols to be imposed on art market participants probably sometime next year.

About the Author

Georges Lederman

Special Counsel, Withersworldwide

Georges is special counsel in the litigation and arbitration team.

Georges is an experienced white-collar defense attorney and former prosecutor who has focused on representing art world clients over the past 17 years. He has tried over 30 felony jury trials to verdict and has handled both criminal and civil matters that have received international media coverage.

For art market and other clients who have been under investigation by the Government, Georges has appeared before the New York County District Attorney’s Office; the United States Attorney’s Offices for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; the New York State Attorney General’s Office; the Department of Homeland Security; United States Customs and Border Protection; United States Fish and Wildlife Service; New York State Department of Environmental Conservation; the IRS Criminal Investigation Division; the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance; and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Office of Investigations.

Georges also represents collectors, art dealers, authenticators, galleries, museums, auction houses and luxury brand retailers in a wide range of civil matters involving title, provenance, authenticity, breach of contract and civil fraud. Georges advises these same clients as to compliance with federal and state government regulations involving the sale, transfer or other disposition of art and cultural assets.