Skip navigation

The Kool-Aid is flowing in St. Louis

or Register to post new content in the forum

24 RepliesJump to last post

 

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Jun 6, 2006 11:14 pm

[quote=Revealer][quote=The Truth]Seems like the Cal AG missed the boat on this along with the regulators.
They focused on the revenue sharing side only. What about the double-
dipping? The wholesale practice of dumping good, non-preferred funds to
go into these "preferred" funds? High commission exchange for no
recognizable benefit. That should have been the focus. Jones always touts
they hold their preferred funds longer. Well, that is great. What about the
better performing funds that the clients owned that were conveniently
dumped? [/quote] Onliest firm I know that uses the "liquidate and transfer" form [/quote]

Come on Rev,

   I worked in a CAT tream for a firm, are you really saying EJ is the only firm that has a form for "Liquidate" and transfer????  I hope your not serious.  Again, not defending EJ, just the truth.  

Halla

Jun 6, 2006 11:19 pm

You all are right though D&C are kick#$%, nothing worse than trying to get a prospective client to "liquidate and transfer" those guys.  That "form" is just no good when you up against D&C.

Been fun posting, gotta go knock the bottom out of some @#@

cya

Jun 6, 2006 11:54 pm

Not that it matters, but I did not start this thread??

Jun 7, 2006 3:11 am

[quote=Ready2Jump]Not that it matters, but I did not start this thread??[/quote]

Yeah, Big Brother ruined this thread by cutting the story post that started it...might as well just kill the whole thread...makes no sense as it is...