Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

When Resorting to the Courts Isn’t All BadWhen Resorting to the Courts Isn’t All Bad

An added level of protection and clarity may be needed.

Sandra D. Glazier, Equity Shareholder

November 20, 2024

12 Min Read
Glazier_GettyImages-1346156711.jpg

Often, planners extol the virtues of planning to avoid court involvement. They may recommend using supportive decision making, designated beneficiaries and the creation of durable powers of attorney, designations of patient advocates and revocable inter vivos trusts. However, seeking court involvement may be helpful or even necessary despite the existence of a full cadre of executed and enforceable estate-planning documents. While estate planning is important in implementing clients’ desires, planners shouldn’t advise clients that the existence of executed estate-planning documents will always avoid the need for court intervention.

Supportive Decision Making

Supportive decision making is a process that allows clients to make their own deci...

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?

About the Author

Sandra D. Glazier

Equity Shareholder, Lipson Neilson P.C.

Sandra Glazier is an equity shareholder in Lipson Neilson P.C., in its Bloomfield Hills, Michigan office. Lipson Neilson has offices in Michigan, Nevada and Arizona.