Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

Watershed YearWatershed Year

How the U.S. Supreme Court profoundly reshaped the retirement planning landscape, and other game changers

Michael J. Jones, Partner

December 22, 2014

19 Min Read
Watershed Year

When it comes to retirement plan accounts, planners must gear up to incorporate new rules and new opportunities that surfaced in 2014.

 

No Bankruptcy Exclusion 

Estate planners will have to re-think how retirement death benefits will be protected from creditors in the wake of Clark v. Rameker.1 In Clark, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the bankruptcy estate of Heidi Heffron-Clark couldn’t exclude the individual retirement account she inherited from her mother.  

The court said Heidi’s inherited IRA didn’t constitute funds held for her retirement because: (1) it didn’t (and couldn’t) hold funds Heidi contributed, (2) it won’t be subject to the 10 percent tax on pre-age 59½ distributions, and (3) required minimum distributions (RMDs) forced ...

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?

About the Author

Michael J. Jones

Partner, Thompson Jones LLP

Mike is a partner in Thompson Jones LLP. His tax consulting practice focuses on sophisticated wealth transfer strategy, trust and probate matters (both administration and controversy resolution), family business transitions, and taxpayer representation before the IRS. He is a noted authority on estate planning for IRA and retirement plan benefits, and chairs Trusts & Estates magazine's Retirement Benefits Committee. Mike was listed among CPA Magazine's Top 50 IRS Practitioners and Top 40 Tax Advisors to Know During a Recession.