Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

Tips From the Pros: When Diversification By a Trustee May Not be NecessaryTips From the Pros: When Diversification By a Trustee May Not be Necessary

Charles A. Redd discusses cases in which trust instrument language may enable or even compel a trustee not to diversify.

Charles A. Redd, Attorney

April 17, 2019

14 Min Read
TE-tips.jpg

Diversification in investing trust assets has been a default expectation for as long as most anyone in the trust administration business can remember. Even an investment novice understands that diversification reduces risk of loss. An individual investing for himself may choose to invest a disproportionately large amount of his net worth in a single asset or asset class. If the gamble fails, only the individual suffers. The individual owes no duties to anyone. A trustee, however, doesn’t have such latitude. A trustee of a trust owes many duties to its beneficiaries, one of the most important of which is the duty to invest trust property prudently.

The UPIA

The Uniform Prudent Investor Act (UPIA), promulgated by the National Conference of C...

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?

About the Author

Charles A. Redd

Attorney, Stinson LLP

A partner with Stinson LLP in its St. Louis office, Mr. Redd concentrates his practice in estate planning, estate and trust administration and estate and trust-related litigation. Mr. Redd is a Fellow of the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel and currently teaches as an adjunct professor at Northwestern Law. He was a contributing author to Adams, 21st Century Estate Planning: Practical Applications (Cannon Financial Institute, 2002). Mr. Redd received his J.D. from Saint Louis University.