Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

Tips From the Pros: The Specter of Double Inclusion in the Gross EstateTips From the Pros: The Specter of Double Inclusion in the Gross Estate

Charles A. Redd discusses the anomaly of double inclusion in two Tax Court decisions.

Charles A. Redd, Attorney

April 20, 2021

7 Min Read
TE-tips.jpg

Estate of Powell v. Commissioner1 is well-known among estate-planning professionals for having staked out new ground in its Internal Revenue Code Section 2036(a)(2) analysis. The decedent, Nancy Powell, a week before her death, conveyed about $10 million in cash and securities to a family limited partnership (FLP) in exchange for a 99% limited partner interest. The Tax Court held that IRC Section 2036(a)(2) applied because, at the moment of her death, the decedent had the power, along with her sons, to terminate the FLP and, through her attorney-in-fact, had the ability to control FLP distributions. Thus, according to the court, the decedent had the right, in conjunction with all the other partners (her sons), “to designate the persons w...

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?

About the Author

Charles A. Redd

Attorney, Stinson LLP

A partner with Stinson LLP in its St. Louis office, Mr. Redd concentrates his practice in estate planning, estate and trust administration and estate and trust-related litigation. Mr. Redd is a Fellow of the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel and currently teaches as an adjunct professor at Northwestern Law. He was a contributing author to Adams, 21st Century Estate Planning: Practical Applications (Cannon Financial Institute, 2002). Mr. Redd received his J.D. from Saint Louis University.