Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

Tips From the Pros: Includible and Deductible Amounts Not Always the SameTips From the Pros: Includible and Deductible Amounts Not Always the Same

Charles A. Redd discusses the Tax Court’s ruling in Estate of Warne v. Comm’r.

Charles A. Redd, Attorney

July 22, 2021

6 Min Read
TE-tips.jpg

Ordinarily, in a case in which an asset is passing at a decedent’s death in a disposition qualifying for the marital or the charitable deduction, that asset’s value for purposes of arriving at the total gross estate value is the same as its value for purposes of determining the amount of the marital or charitable deduction. The U.S. Tax Court recently decided a case, however, that serves as a stark reminder that this seemingly appropriate proposition, while symmetrical, isn’t always true. 

Alleged Gift/ Estate Tax Deficiencies

In Estate of Warne v. Commissioner,1 Miriam Warne owned, in what was obviously a revocable trust but was called a “Family Trust,” controlling, majority interests in five limited liability companies (LLCs). Miriam own...

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?

About the Author

Charles A. Redd

Attorney, Stinson LLP

A partner with Stinson LLP in its St. Louis office, Mr. Redd concentrates his practice in estate planning, estate and trust administration and estate and trust-related litigation. Mr. Redd is a Fellow of the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel and currently teaches as an adjunct professor at Northwestern Law. He was a contributing author to Adams, 21st Century Estate Planning: Practical Applications (Cannon Financial Institute, 2002). Mr. Redd received his J.D. from Saint Louis University.