![TE-tips.jpg TE-tips.jpg](https://eu-images.contentstack.com/v3/assets/bltabaa95ef14172c61/bltf513cd8382e0e501/67348b005f93170c3d8ddbc3/TE-tips_32.jpg?width=1280&auto=webp&quality=95&format=jpg&disable=upscale)
Ordinarily, in a case in which an asset is passing at a decedent’s death in a disposition qualifying for the marital or the charitable deduction, that asset’s value for purposes of arriving at the total gross estate value is the same as its value for purposes of determining the amount of the marital or charitable deduction. The U.S. Tax Court recently decided a case, however, that serves as a stark reminder that this seemingly appropriate proposition, while symmetrical, isn’t always true.
Alleged Gift/ Estate Tax Deficiencies
In Estate of Warne v. Commissioner,1 Miriam Warne owned, in what was obviously a revocable trust but was called a “Family Trust,” controlling, majority interests in five limited liability companies (LLCs). Miriam own...
Unlock All Access Premium Subscription
Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!
Already Subscribed?