Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

Tips From the Pros: Bulletproofing the Estate PlanTips From the Pros: Bulletproofing the Estate Plan

Charles A. Redd discusses restrictions on and laws relating to no contest clauses.

Charles A. Redd, Attorney

August 21, 2019

10 Min Read
TE-tips.jpg

A beneficiary may be motivated to contest a will or trust instrument because he believes he has sufficient grounds to invalidate the document (for example, due to forgery, lack of proper execution, fraud, incapacity, undue influence, duress) and stands to gain economically if successful. A successful challenge to the validity of a document will cause the decedent’s estate or trust to pass intestate or pursuant to an earlier document that wasn’t contested (or wasn’t contested successfully).

In some instances, a beneficiary may challenge the validity of only a portion of a document. If the beneficiary is successful, only that provision is eliminated, and the remainder of the will or trust instrument continues in effect. This approach, when ...

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?

About the Author

Charles A. Redd

Attorney, Stinson LLP

A partner with Stinson LLP in its St. Louis office, Mr. Redd concentrates his practice in estate planning, estate and trust administration and estate and trust-related litigation. Mr. Redd is a Fellow of the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel and currently teaches as an adjunct professor at Northwestern Law. He was a contributing author to Adams, 21st Century Estate Planning: Practical Applications (Cannon Financial Institute, 2002). Mr. Redd received his J.D. from Saint Louis University.