![jones118 jones118](https://eu-images.contentstack.com/v3/assets/bltabaa95ef14172c61/blt8649f2356475e7a7/6733f69408c558aeac301db1/0118-te-jones.jpg?width=1280&auto=webp&quality=95&format=jpg&disable=upscale)
Last year’s developments serve to remind planners what can go wrong—and what can go right with planning.
Settlement Proceeds
In Ozimkoski v. Commissioner,1 Thomas W. Ozimkoski, Sr. died testate, and his individual retirement account was payable to his estate. A will contest between his widow, Suzanne, and his son from a prior marriage, Thomas Jr., ended in a settlement agreement. Under that agreement, Thomas Jr. became entitled to his father’s 1967 Harley-Davidson motorcycle and $110,000 cash, free of income taxes. Suzanne was entitled to the rest, except for some personal property.
Suzanne’s share included her husband’s IRA. In 2008, Suzanne transferred $235,495.46 into a rollover IRA titled in her name and treated it as her own IRA. Late...
Unlock All Access Premium Subscription
Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!
Already Subscribed?