![Trusts & Estates logo Trusts & Estates logo](https://eu-images.contentstack.com/v3/assets/bltabaa95ef14172c61/bltbd5defc64f6009ee/670cf9093dbe55752cb9da04/cf81ba8d-3b13-48d4-9e34-9fad6c8627d7.jpg?width=700&auto=webp&quality=80&disable=upscale)
The Kimbell VictoryThe Kimbell Victory
Estate-planning lawyers are cheering a recent taxpayer win in the ongoing battle with the Internal Revenue Service over family limited partnerships (FLPs). The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dealt the IRS a stinging defeat May 20 in Kimbell v. United States (No. 03-10529), when it overturned a lower court's decision and found that $2.5 milllion in assets transferred by a family matriarch
June 1, 2004
Rorie M. Sherman Editor in Chief
Estate-planning lawyers are cheering a recent taxpayer win in the ongoing battle with the Internal Revenue Service over family limited partnerships (FLPs). The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dealt the IRS a stinging defeat May 20 in Kimbell v. United States (No. 03-10529), when it overturned a lower court's decision and found that $2.5 milllion in assets transferred by a family matriarch into a family limited partnership were not includible in her estate under Internal Revenue Code Section 2036(a). That provision returns assets transferred before death to the estate, unless the transfer was “a bona fide sale for an adequate and full consideration.”
The family had argued that only Ruth Kimbell's...
Unlock All Access Premium Subscription
Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!
Already Subscribed?