Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

The Future is NowThe Future is Now

Espen Robak posits how estate planners can take post-valuation date events into account when determining a valuation.

Espen Robak, President and Founder

January 25, 2017

13 Min Read
robakfeb17

Almost all valuation disputes take place long after the date of valuation. The argument then often turns, not just to the evidence considered by the appraiser or appraisers around the valuation date, but also on what could have or should have been considered. Since all valuations contain an implicit prophecy of the future, few fact finders will agree to ignore completely the actual path of events after the valuation date. After all, many of those events may have been foreseeable on the valuation date, even though the appraiser failed to predict them. 

When is such reliance on subsequent events reasonable and appropriate? And, to what extent? Courts differ greatly in their reliance and weighting of subsequent events. Let’s attempt to tease...

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?

About the Author

Espen Robak

President and Founder, Pluris Valuation Advisors LLC

Espen Robak is President and founder of Pluris Valuation Advisors LLC and a nationally recognized expert on intellectual property and business valuation, restricted and illiquid securities, securities design, levels of value, and discounts for lack of liquidity. Pluris’ practice includes portfolio valuations for investment funds and financial institutions, as well as a broad range of financial reporting and tax opinions for public and private companies. Mr. Robak is a frequent contributor to books and professional journals on valuation, accounting, and taxation topics.