Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

The Door to the Courthouse Finally Closed Shut for DAF Donors?The Door to the Courthouse Finally Closed Shut for DAF Donors?

Christopher P. Woehrle discusses the recent U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Pinkert v. Schwab Charitable Fund.

Christopher P. Woehrle, Professor and Chair, Department of Tax and Estate Planning

November 23, 2022

5 Min Read
TE-tips.jpg

In Pinkert v. Schwab Charitable Fund,1 Philip Pinkert sued the Schwab Charitable Fund (the Fund) and the Charles Schwab Corporation (the Corporation), alleging the Fund breached its fiduciary duty by making imprudent investments with his contributions to a donor-advised fund (DAF) and charging him grossly excessive administrative fees. This resulted in a diminished performance of the DAF, reducing Philip’s capacity to fulfill his philanthropic aims. Given the very close business relationship between the Fund and the Corporation, Philip believed the Fund wasn’t negotiating lower rates for custodial and brokerage fees to be paid to the Corporation. Nor was the Fund providing access to funds with lower fees that should have been available t...

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?

About the Author

Christopher P. Woehrle

Professor and Chair, Department of Tax and Estate Planning, College for Financial Planning, a Kaplan Company

Christopher P. Woehrle is an adjunct professor of taxation at the Widger School of Law, Villanova University in Villanova, Pa.