Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

The Contract Means What It Says; Signer Beware!The Contract Means What It Says; Signer Beware!

Christopher P. Woehrle shares lessons learned from a recent Texas case about family settlement agreements.

Christopher P. Woehrle, Professor and Chair, Department of Tax and Estate Planning

March 21, 2022

5 Min Read
TE-philanthropy.jpg

The planned giving programs of most charities derive the bulk of their revenue from matured bequests. Their finance departments understandably seek a reasonable estimate about timing of payment. Counsel for the donor’s estate usually will cooperate in projecting the availability of the funds. Without exception, counsel asks the charity to sign a Family Settlement Agreement (FSA), sometimes referred to as a “Receipt, Release and Indemnification Agreement,” committing the charity to the return of funds in the event the share was calculated incorrectly or needed for payment of unavoidable obligations like federal, state and local taxes. This arrangement generally works well for all the parties. The recent case of Austin Trust Company v. Hou...

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?

About the Author

Christopher P. Woehrle

Professor and Chair, Department of Tax and Estate Planning, College for Financial Planning, a Kaplan Company

Christopher P. Woehrle is an adjunct professor of taxation at the Widger School of Law, Villanova University in Villanova, Pa.