Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

Takeaways on Investor ControlTakeaways on Investor Control

Webber v. Commissioner highlights how courts will apply this doctrine to private placement life insurance

Melvin A. Warshaw

November 19, 2015

12 Min Read
Takeaways on Investor Control

Many articles1 have been written about the recent investor control case, Webber v. Commissioner.2 In Webber, the Tax Court found the policyholder personally liable for taxes on income earned on assets held in separate accounts that supported offshore private placement life insurance (PPLI) policies, because he maintained excessive control over the policies’ assets and, therefore, was considered their owner for tax purposes. While the facts in the case were extreme, the case highlights the continued importance of the investor control doctrine and how courts will apply it to PPLI and annuities.

High-net-worth clients considering private placement variable products should expect that the Internal Revenue Service and Tax Court will look beyon...

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?

About the Author

Melvin A. Warshaw

Melvin A. Warshaw, Esq. is an international cross-border tax and private client lawyer based in Massachusetts. He is an ACTEC Fellow, an Academician of the International Academy of Estate and Trust Law and a member of the International Practice committee of the editorial board of Trusts and Estates.