Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

Such Dear Perfection?Such Dear Perfection?

Grieve v. Commissioner rejects novel valuation theory.

Espen Robak, President and Founder

April 20, 2020

11 Min Read
te0520 robak value.jpg

When valuing a non-controlling, minority interest in an entity for tax purposes, both the government and taxpayers generally agree that significant discounts must apply. But, what if the non-controlling interest being valued isn’t a minority interest? In limited partnerships and limited liability companies, the majority interest (for example, 75% of the entity) can easily be divorced from control by making the minority the general partner or managing member. 

But, what if the interest being valued is an extremely large majority, to the point where it constitutes almost the entirety of the economic interest in the entity? Is that a case for a radically reduced discount? This was the main question recently decided in Grieve v. Commissioner.

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?

About the Author

Espen Robak

President and Founder, Pluris Valuation Advisors LLC

Espen Robak is President and founder of Pluris Valuation Advisors LLC and a nationally recognized expert on intellectual property and business valuation, restricted and illiquid securities, securities design, levels of value, and discounts for lack of liquidity. Pluris’ practice includes portfolio valuations for investment funds and financial institutions, as well as a broad range of financial reporting and tax opinions for public and private companies. Mr. Robak is a frequent contributor to books and professional journals on valuation, accounting, and taxation topics.