Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

Review of Reviews: “Forfeiting Trust,” 57 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. (2015)Review of Reviews: “Forfeiting Trust,” 57 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. (2015)

Deborah S. Gordon, professor of law at Drexel University Thomas R. Kline School of Law in Philadelphia

Turney P. Berry, Partner

June 25, 2015

5 Min Read
Review of Reviews: “Forfeiting Trust,” 57 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. (2015)

Often, wills include a forfeiture or no-contest clause that purports to terminate a beneficiary’s interest if the beneficiary contests the will or any of its provisions. Although two states—Florida and Indiana—refuse to enforce such clauses, Professor Deborah S. Gordon in her interesting new article, “Forfeiting Trust,” finds that most states will enforce them, although in varying circumstances. For example, the author cites 11 states that permit forfeiture of a challenger’s interest even if the challenge to the will is eventually upheld, thus allowing a challenger to choose how much litigation risk to bear. Not surprisingly, the majority rule is in between these two approaches, and the article summarizes that rule as follows:

 

Most state...

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?

About the Author

Turney P. Berry

Partner, Wyatt Tarrant & Combs LLP

Turney Berry is the leader of the Firm's Trusts, Estates & Personal Planning Service Team, he also serves on the Firm's Executive Committee.  He concentrates his practice in the areas of estate and business planning, estate and trust administration, and charitable giving and tax-exempt organizations.