Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

Obergefell: The Final Word (But Not Really) on Same-Sex MarriageObergefell: The Final Word (But Not Really) on Same-Sex Marriage

The U.S. Supreme Court ruling has repercussions involving property transfers and devises

George D. Karibjanian, Partner

July 23, 2015

12 Min Read
Obergefell: The Final Word (But Not Really) on Same-Sex Marriage

On June 26, 2015, when the U.S. Supreme Court decided Obergefell et al. v. Hodges et al.,1 many practitioners believed that, together with United States v. Windsor,2 all debates on same-sex marriage had finally ended. To a large degree, at least as to the legality issue, that’s true. However, unbeknownst to many practitioners, beneath the decision lurks a series of thought-provoking repercussions involving property transfers and devises.3 

The Ruling

By a 5-4 majority, the Supreme Court determined that a state can’t prohibit same-sex marriages and must also recognize valid out-of-state same-sex marriages, as both are protected under the due process and equal protection clauses of the fourteenth amendment.  

The key discussion in the due pro...

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?

About the Author

George D. Karibjanian

Partner, Franklin Karibjanian & Law, PLLC

 George D. Karibjanian is a partner at Franklin Karibjanian & Law, PLLC, with offices in Washington, D.C., Boca Raton and Naples. He was previously senior counsel in the Personal Planning Department in the Boca Raton, Fla. office of Proskauer Rose LLP.