![Obergefell: The Final Word (But Not Really) on Same-Sex Marriage Obergefell: The Final Word (But Not Really) on Same-Sex Marriage](https://eu-images.contentstack.com/v3/assets/bltabaa95ef14172c61/blte27938bf1b08837c/6733f2a9474009827f561376/karib-same-sex-marriage.jpg?width=1280&auto=webp&quality=95&format=jpg&disable=upscale)
On June 26, 2015, when the U.S. Supreme Court decided Obergefell et al. v. Hodges et al.,1 many practitioners believed that, together with United States v. Windsor,2 all debates on same-sex marriage had finally ended. To a large degree, at least as to the legality issue, that’s true. However, unbeknownst to many practitioners, beneath the decision lurks a series of thought-provoking repercussions involving property transfers and devises.3
The Ruling
By a 5-4 majority, the Supreme Court determined that a state can’t prohibit same-sex marriages and must also recognize valid out-of-state same-sex marriages, as both are protected under the due process and equal protection clauses of the fourteenth amendment.
The key discussion in the due pro...
Unlock All Access Premium Subscription
Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!
Already Subscribed?