Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

Not Married By DefinitionNot Married By Definition

FedEx retirement plan’s meaning of “spouse” might violate federal law

Not Married By Definition

A recent decision by a U.S. district court addresses the question of whether a participant’s same-sex surviving spouse can be denied benefits under a private company’s Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)-covered defined benefit plan.  

 

Background

In 1984, the election year when Congressional Representative Geraldine Ferraro ran as Walter Mondale’s candidate for vice president, the Retirement Equity Act was passed. Among its provisions was a mandate that pension plans subject to ERISA provide a “qualified joint and survivor annuity” to a surviving spouse, a benefit that could only be defeated by a spouse’s written waiver and consent.1

The definition of “spouse” has evolved dramatically since then—first among the states, then in ...

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?

About the Authors

Susan von Herrmann

Partner, Perkins Coie LLP

Susan von Herrmann is a partner in Perkins Coie LLP, based in the firm’s San Francisco and Palo Alto, Calif. offices.

Michael J. Jones

Partner, Thompson Jones LLP

Mike is a partner in Thompson Jones LLP. His tax consulting practice focuses on sophisticated wealth transfer strategy, trust and probate matters (both administration and controversy resolution), family business transitions, and taxpayer representation before the IRS. He is a noted authority on estate planning for IRA and retirement plan benefits, and chairs Trusts & Estates magazine's Retirement Benefits Committee. Mike was listed among CPA Magazine's Top 50 IRS Practitioners and Top 40 Tax Advisors to Know During a Recession.