Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

Nelson v. Commissioner: Inadequate Drafting Blows The “Lid” Off Transfer TaxesNelson v. Commissioner: Inadequate Drafting Blows The “Lid” Off Transfer Taxes

Christopher P. Woehrle discusses the charitable lid technique and why it’s an effective tool for the estate and charitable gift planner.

Christopher P. Woehrle, Professor and Chair, Department of Tax and Estate Planning

August 21, 2020

5 Min Read
TE-philanthropy.jpg

In James C. Nelson v. Commissioner,1 a donor transferred limited partnership (LP) interests equal to percentage interests that were calculated by an appraiser following a gift and a sale to a trust. The LP’s primary asset was common stock of a family-owned holding company. The holding company owned 100% of seven operating subsidiaries.

The donor made two transfers of LP interests to the trust created for her children and husband. The first transfer was a gift that was described in a memorandum of gift as having a fair market value (FMV) of $2 million as of the date of the gift, as determined by an appraiser within 90 days of the effective date of the assignment. The second transfer was structured as a sale and was memorialized by a memora...

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?

About the Author

Christopher P. Woehrle

Professor and Chair, Department of Tax and Estate Planning, College for Financial Planning, a Kaplan Company

Christopher P. Woehrle is an adjunct professor of taxation at the Widger School of Law, Villanova University in Villanova, Pa.