![Dougherty.jpg Dougherty.jpg](https://eu-images.contentstack.com/v3/assets/bltabaa95ef14172c61/blt39976349170ba66e/6734b20e1a9595457959b31f/Dougherty.jpg?width=1280&auto=webp&quality=95&format=jpg&disable=upscale)
For a period of time, Tax Court decisions regarding family limited partnerships (FLPs) had a familiar read to them. A typical FLP case involved an assertion by the Internal Revenue Service that the transferor retained rights to transferred property that were impermissible under Internal Revenue Code Section 2036(a)(1), and the defense would stand or fall on whether the transfer was a bona fide sale for full and adequate consideration. Case analysis largely focused on what worked and didn’t regarding the estate’s ability to demonstrate legitimate non-tax purposes for the transfer. In 2017, Estate of Powell v. Commissioner raised new issues.1 While variety can be the spice of life—this case certainly left a bad taste for two reasons: (1) t...
Unlock All Access Premium Subscription
Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!
Already Subscribed?