Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

Moore IRC Section 2043 Issues for FLP PlanningMoore IRC Section 2043 Issues for FLP Planning

Tax Court further explores the consequences of its holding in Powell.

Dougherty.jpg

For a period of time, Tax Court decisions regarding family limited partnerships (FLPs) had a familiar read to them. A typical FLP case involved an assertion by the Internal Revenue Service that the transferor retained rights to transferred property that were impermissible under Internal Revenue Code Section 2036(a)(1), and the defense would stand or fall on whether the transfer was a bona fide sale for full and adequate consideration. Case analysis largely focused on what worked and didn’t regarding the estate’s ability to demonstrate legitimate non-tax purposes for the transfer. In 2017, Estate of Powell v. Commissioner raised new issues.1 While variety can be the spice of life—this case certainly left a bad taste for two reasons: (1) t...

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?

About the Authors

James I. Dougherty

Partner, Dungey Dougherty PLLC

James is a partner at Dungey Dougherty PLLC, practicing out of Greenwich, Connecticut and New York City. His practice focuses on the estate planning and estate administration needs of high net worth individuals and their families. James assists executors and beneficiaries alike through all aspects of the estate administration process including probate, contested estates, tax, and post-mortem estate planning issues. His estate planning practice is focused on working with affluent individuals in the development and implementation of sophisticated planning techniques to help them accumulate, preserve, and transfer their wealth.

Louis R. Piscatelli

Partner, Withers Bergman LLP

Louis R. Piscatelli is a partner at Withers Bergman LLP in New Haven, Conn.