Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

Mann v. United States: Lost Opportunity to “Salvage” A DeductionMann v. United States: Lost Opportunity to “Salvage” A Deduction

Christopher P. Woehrle examines the “demolish and construct” strategy.

Christopher P. Woehrle, Professor and Chair, Department of Tax and Estate Planning

May 21, 2021

4 Min Read
TE-philanthropy.jpg

The scarcity of land for residential use in urban and suburban areas makes relocating more difficult than building a residence on undeveloped land. It may be more practical, though possibly more expensive, to buy a new residence in a desired neighborhood with the goal of destroying it and building a new one. Some taxpayers got the idea of donating a building about to be demolished to firefighters for their training and taking a charitable deduction for the value of the building, known as a “demolish and construct” strategy. But this didn’t always work out as planned. Let’s examine that strategy as well as one of “deconstruct and construct,” in which taxpayers missed the opportunity to claim a deduction.

Deconstruct and Construct

In Scharf ...

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?

About the Author

Christopher P. Woehrle

Professor and Chair, Department of Tax and Estate Planning, College for Financial Planning, a Kaplan Company

Christopher P. Woehrle is an adjunct professor of taxation at the Widger School of Law, Villanova University in Villanova, Pa.