![TE-philanthropy.jpg TE-philanthropy.jpg](https://eu-images.contentstack.com/v3/assets/bltabaa95ef14172c61/bltab3158442c9d257f/6734e1da2d01b96d38e3f158/TE-philanthropy_34.jpg?width=1280&auto=webp&quality=95&format=jpg&disable=upscale)
High-net-worth donors are accustomed to exercising great control and autonomy in their business careers. It shouldn’t be surprising to learn that they’re the same way with their philanthropy, including wanting to exert control not only over how funds are used but also how they’re invested. While the Internal Revenue Code permits donors to recommend to a donor-advised fund how donated funds are invested, what flexibility, if any, exists for a donor who contributes directly to a charity? How can a donor be involved in the investing without the involvement being deemed the retention of a substantial right, thus preventing a deduction?
Gift Conditioned on “Control”
Consider this scenario: Sally Smith has been a prolific and successful institut...
Unlock All Access Premium Subscription
Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!
Already Subscribed?