Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

Making the Election or NotMaking the Election or Not

The challenges of dealing with the choice of tax regimes for 2010 decedents can approach you from many fronts. The tax consequences of the different regimes, the interpretation of formula clauses and the changes in funding due to the imposition of the generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax all require a fiduciary to tread cautiously and carefully. One misstep and much can be lost.

Stacy E. Singer, Senior Vice President

June 1, 2011

3 Min Read
Wealth Management logo in a gray background | Wealth Management

Stacy E. Singer

The challenges of dealing with the choice of tax regimes for 2010 decedents can approach you from many fronts. The tax consequences of the different regimes, the interpretation of formula clauses and the changes in funding due to the imposition of the generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax all require a fiduciary to tread cautiously and carefully. One misstep and much can be lost.

In the wake of the 2010 Tax Act, we at Northern Trust are reviewing the 2010 estates for which we serve as fiduciary. Our review includes, among other things, an analysis of four issues involved with the election:

  1. Is the value of the estate (including prior taxable gifts) impacted by aggressive discounts or deductions?

    If the gross estate will require the filing of a federal estate tax return under the default estate tax regime that will reflect aggressive discounts or deductions, remaining within the estate tax regime may not be beneficial, regardless of the tax calculation.

  2. Will the tax election impact how assets are distributed or allocated?

    You may see the impact of the election reflected in which (or whether) trusts are funded; in different terms for income and principal rights among the trusts; in different beneficiaries; in different powers of appointment to which such trusts are subject; and in different withdrawal rights.

    We've already seen several situations in which the election impacts whether only a family trust is funded (as would occur under the modified carryover basis approach from the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001) or whether both a family and marital trust are funded (as would occur under the 2010 Tax Act). In many cases, the surviving spouse is the sole beneficiary of both trusts, but is given a broad limited power of appointment over any marital trust and a very narrow limited power of appointment over the family trust. Depending on the family situation, this difference may be significant to the surviving spouse and to the children, whether they're children of the decedent, the surviving spouse or both. Of course, this situation may be exacerbated if the descendants are beneficiaries of the family trust, either exclusively or with the surviving spouse. In those situations, either a family settlement agreement or a court proceeding may be necessary to resolve the conflict.

  3. Does the governing instrument or state law allow for equitable adjustments?

    Were such adjustments between principal and income permitted to compensate for the impact of tax elections? If so, we may consider making an adjustment, subject to approval from all impacted beneficiaries.

  4. Does the attorney for the estate or trust agree with our proposed approach?

    We request and review the written opinion from the attorney prior to implementing the election decision to ensure that we've considered the issues from all angles before we proceed.

    The challenges inherent in these decisions are just beginning to come into focus as we review each of our accounts. As we move through our own process of settling 2010 decedents' estates, new issues will continue to emerge, but will be met with the care and thoughtfulness required of all fiduciaries who are emerging from a year in the trenches.

Stacy E. Singer is a senior vice president and manager of estate settlement services at Northern Trust in Chicago

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?

About the Author

Stacy E. Singer

Senior Vice President, The Northern Trust Company

Stacy E. Singer is a Senior Vice President at The Northern Trust Company, Chicago. She is the Central Region Advisory Practice Executive, where she works closely with trust professionals on all aspects of the delivery of fiduciary services to clients throughout the Midwest.

Prior to joining Northern Trust as a Vice President in June 2003, Stacy was a Vice President in Estate Administration at Harris Trust & Savings Bank. Other previous positions include an Associate at Burke, Warren, MacKay & Serritella, P.C. from 1995 to 1999 and an Associate at Chuhak & Tecson, P.C. from 1993 to 1995.

Stacy received a B.A. degree in Political Science with high honors from the University of Michigan and a J.D. degree from the University of Michigan Law School. She also holds a Certified Private Wealth Planner designation.

Stacy is a member of the Board of Directors of the Chicago Estate Planning Council, where she serves as Vice President and Program Chair. She is a former Adjunct Professor at the John Marshall Law School, Center for Tax Law and Employee Benefits and was previously on the Faculty of the American Bankers Association National Trust School. She is a member of the Professional Advisory Committee for Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago.