Sponsored By

IRS Rules on Tax Consequences Associated With Early Termination of a Generation-Skipping Taxable Marital TrustIRS Rules on Tax Consequences Associated With Early Termination of a Generation-Skipping Taxable Marital Trust

Surviving spouse deemed transferor for gift tax and GST purposes

4 Min Read
IRS Rules on Tax Consequences Associated With Early Termination of a Generation-Skipping Taxable Marital Trust

A surviving spouse was the beneficiary of two marital trusts established under her late husband’s revocable trust agreement: one generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax exempt and the other GST taxable. The provisions of each marital trust provided for the surviving spouse to receive all income during life and granted to the surviving spouse a testamentary general power of appointment (POA) over the assets in the GST taxable trust.

State law allowed for the early termination of non-charitable irrevocable trusts, conditioned on all beneficiaries consenting to such early termination and the court concluding that continuance of the trust isn’t necessary to achieve any material purpose of the trust. 

By agreement, the surviving spouse and the remaindermen beneficiaries agreed to terminate both marital trusts and successfully petitioned the local probate court for an order of termination. By agreeing to terminate the marital trusts, the surviving spouse surrendered her income interest and released her general POA over the balance of the assets in the GST taxable marital trust. In exchange, the agreement provided that the surviving spouse shall receive cash, securities and payment by the trustee of any income taxes or gift taxes payable with respect to the distribution. The balance of the assets would then be distributed to a trust for the benefit of the remaindermen. The court approved the termination of the two marital trusts. 

The taxpayers sought guidance from the Internal Revenue Service as to potential tax consequences of the transaction. Specifically the taxpayers were interested in the tax consequences flowing from the termination of the GST taxable marital trust. In PLR 201615004 (released April 8, 2016), the IRS made three rulings with respect to these facts.

QTIP Election Null and Void

In Revenue Procedure 2001-38, the IRS set forth a rule that a qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) election is treated as null and void when the election isn’t necessary to reduce the estate tax liability to zero. In the present case, the estate tax liability would have been zero even if the executor failed to make a QTIP election for the GST taxable trust because the surviving spouse had an income interest and testamentary general POA sufficient for her spouse’s estate to receive a deduction under Internal Revenue Code Section 2056(b)(5). Reaffirming the rule in the Revenue Procedure and finding the QTIP election was null and void, the IRS concluded in the PLR that the property held in the GST taxable marital trust isn’t includible in the gross estate of the surviving spouse under IRC Section 2044. Thus, because there’s no valid QTIP election and no “qualifying income interest,” the surviving spouse isn’t treated as making a gift under IRC Section 2519 by disposing of the income interest with respect to the property. No GST tax consequences resulted from the release of the income interest, as there was no deemed gift under Section 2519.

Release of General POA Results in Gift

Though no gift resulted under Section 2519 as the result of a release of a “qualifying income interest,” the release of a general POA creates a taxable gift under IRC Section 2514(b). When a donor transfers an interest in property for less than adequate consideration, Treasury Regulations Section 25.2512-8 values the gift as equal to the value of the property transferred by the donor that exceeds the value in money or money’s worth of the consideration given therefor. Accordingly, when the surviving spouse released her POA and transferred the assets of the GST taxable trust for less than an adequate and full consideration, the surviving spouse is deemed to have made a gift. While the IRS declined to make a factual determination as to the value of any gift, it indicated that only the excess value of the fair market value of the GST taxable marital trust assets at the time of the release over the value of the consideration received by the surviving spouse in exchange for those trust assets would deemed a taxable gift. 

Same Transferor for Gift and GST Purposes

IRC Section 2652(a) deems the donor of any gift to be the transferor. To the extent a taxable gift was made when the general POA was released over the assets held in the GST taxable trust, the IRS concluded that the surviving spouse was also deemed to have been the transferor for GST tax purposes.

About the Authors

Andrew M. Nerney

Of Counsel, Gunster

Andrew M. Nerney concentrates his practice on providing sophisticated counsel to high-net-worth individuals and families, including same-sex married and unmarried couples, to create tax-efficient wealth transfer strategies through estate, tax, business succession, and asset protection planning.

Andrew has notable experience counseling clients on exemption capture planning, drafting estate planning documents, assisting with the preparation of gift tax, estate tax, and fiduciary income tax returns, assisting individuals with the establishment and maintenance of tax-exempt organizations, foundations, and trusts, as well as conducting extensive research on income, estate, generation-skipping transfer, and capital gains taxation.

Andrew is also experienced at assisting fiduciaries and beneficiaries with estate and trust administration matters. He regularly represents fiduciaries before the probate courts in estate administration proceedings. In addition, Andrew is experienced in aiding in the reformation and decanting of existing trusts to improve their income and estate tax efficiency and utility.

Finally, Andrew also advises individuals interested in planning for charitable giving and changing domicile for tax purposes.

Since no two families are alike, Andrew gives particular attention to the unique and personal circumstances of each client he counsels. He prides himself on developing and implementing advanced planning that achieves the subjective goals identified by his clients.

Andrew B. Seiken

Associate, Cummings & Lockwood

Andrew B. Seiken is an associate in Cummings & Lockwood's Private Clients Group and is based in Stamford, Connecticut. His practice focuses on complex estate planning for high net worth individuals and families with respect to estate, gift and generation-skipping transfer tax and philanthropic planning. He also has experience in domestic and international trust and estate administration.