![Trusts & Estates logo Trusts & Estates logo](https://eu-images.contentstack.com/v3/assets/bltabaa95ef14172c61/bltbd5defc64f6009ee/670cf9093dbe55752cb9da04/cf81ba8d-3b13-48d4-9e34-9fad6c8627d7.jpg?width=700&auto=webp&quality=80&disable=upscale)
Fallible FiduciariesFallible Fiduciaries
Five recent cases highlight how fiduciary conduct can depart from the appropriate standard of care. Three involve professional fiduciaries, while two show the sad, but familiar, problems that can erupt when siblings act as fiduciaries for one another. Another sheds light on the murky and evolving area of the potential duty owed to beneficiaries by the fiduciary's attorney. State courts have been deeply
John Brooks, partner, and Samantha E. Weissbluth, associate, Foley & Lardner, LLP, Chicago
Five recent cases highlight how fiduciary conduct can depart from the appropriate standard of care. Three involve professional fiduciaries, while two show the sad, but familiar, problems that can erupt when siblings act as fiduciaries for one another. Another sheds light on the murky and evolving area of the potential duty owed to beneficiaries by the fiduciary's attorney. State courts have been deeply divided on this issue, with some finding an attorney/client relationship, others noting a fiduciary relationship; and still others finding no duty at all.
Wachovia Bank of Georgia, N.A. v. Namik,1 decided in December of 2003, examines a bank's duty to ...
Unlock All Access Premium Subscription
Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!
Already Subscribed?