![bovepromo bovepromo](https://eu-images.contentstack.com/v3/assets/bltabaa95ef14172c61/bltc1e224ae1f1f04e8/6733fd6d957b3d36a5164370/bovepromo.jpg?width=1280&auto=webp&quality=95&format=jpg&disable=upscale)
Few, if any, of us in the estate-planning profession would question the value and flexibility of the power of appointment (POA). The late professor W. Barton Leach called it, “the most efficient dispositive device that the ingenuity of Anglo-American lawyers has ever worked out.”1 Thus, we all eagerly awaited the result when the Committee appointed by the Uniform Law Commission undertook to review and restate the law to produce the Uniform Power of Appointment Act (UPAA).
As one would hope, such an important undertaking would not only consider the settled and basic principles and practices of the law, but also the need to set aside antiquated rules that hinder, rather than help, the application and objectives of the law. A perfect example...
Unlock All Access Premium Subscription
Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!
Already Subscribed?