![TE-philanthropy.jpg TE-philanthropy.jpg](https://eu-images.contentstack.com/v3/assets/bltabaa95ef14172c61/bltbd99b13406042c8b/6734c728a8f7e228ab9b564e/TE-philanthropy_42.jpg?width=1280&auto=webp&quality=95&format=jpg&disable=upscale)
The recent case of Oconee Landing Property, LLC et al. v. Commissioner (Oconee)1 demonstrates that securing a “qualified appraiser” isn’t enough to document correctly the charitable deduction from a syndicated conservation easement. Before examining the case, let’s review the difference between a conventional and a syndicated conservation easement.
Two Types of Easements
With any easement, a property owner surrenders some future rights of use of their property but retains ownership.
Conventional. A conventional easement is one in which a property owner agrees to protect the natural resources of a parcel of land by restricting its future land use or development. In exchange, the property owner gets a charitable deduction for the reduced val...
Unlock All Access Premium Subscription
Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!
Already Subscribed?