![Trusts & Estates logo Trusts & Estates logo](https://eu-images.contentstack.com/v3/assets/bltabaa95ef14172c61/bltbd5defc64f6009ee/670cf9093dbe55752cb9da04/cf81ba8d-3b13-48d4-9e34-9fad6c8627d7.jpg?width=700&auto=webp&quality=80&disable=upscale)
CHARITABLE GIVING: WHAT NOT TO DOCHARITABLE GIVING: WHAT NOT TO DO
David T. Leibell and Daniel L. Daniels, partners in the Stamford, Conn. office of Cummings & Lockwood LLC, report that a recently released Technical Advice Memorandum (TAM) provides a lovely roadmap on how not to administer a charitable remainder trust (CRT). Here's what Leibell and Daniels have to say: In TAM 200628026, released on July 14, the Internal Revenue Service ruled that a trust was not
November 1, 2006
Rorie M. Sherman Editor in Chief
David T. Leibell and Daniel L. Daniels, partners in the Stamford, Conn. office of Cummings & Lockwood LLC, report that a recently released Technical Advice Memorandum (TAM) provides a lovely roadmap on how not to administer a charitable remainder trust (CRT). Here's what Leibell and Daniels have to say:
In TAM 200628026, released on July 14, the Internal Revenue Service ruled that a trust was not a qualified CRT for federal income tax purposes. That's because the grantor/trustee remained personally liable on the mortgage for the real property transferred to the trust. Also, the trust was used as if it were the grantor/trustee's personal bank account, which means it was not administered in accordance with In...
Unlock All Access Premium Subscription
Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!
Already Subscribed?