Sponsored By
Trusts & Estates logo

Cecil v. Commissioner Provides New Insights on Tax-AffectingCecil v. Commissioner Provides New Insights on Tax-Affecting

How does the court weigh evidence on valuation discounts?

Espen Robak, President and Founder

April 20, 2023

16 Min Read
Robak GettyImages-1355972373.jpg

Ever since Gross v. Commissioner,1 the Tax Court has struggled with the valuation of pass-through entities, such as S corporations (S corps). The question is: Should the earnings of an S corp be tax-affected by imposing an assumed corporate tax rate (based on the taxes of similar C corporations (C corps), for example) to pre-tax earnings and then capitalizing those earnings in some way?

Recently, in Jones v. Comm’r,2 after a 20-year history of denying tax-affecting, one court agreed that it was allowable. However, just two years later, in Jackson v. Comm’r,3 another court didn’t find tax-affecting appropriate.

Now, here comes Cecil v. Comm’r,4 decided in early March, in which the court is again allowing tax-affecting in a valuation case. C...

Unlock All Access Premium Subscription

Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!

Already Subscribed?

About the Author

Espen Robak

President and Founder, Pluris Valuation Advisors LLC

Espen Robak is President and founder of Pluris Valuation Advisors LLC and a nationally recognized expert on intellectual property and business valuation, restricted and illiquid securities, securities design, levels of value, and discounts for lack of liquidity. Pluris’ practice includes portfolio valuations for investment funds and financial institutions, as well as a broad range of financial reporting and tax opinions for public and private companies. Mr. Robak is a frequent contributor to books and professional journals on valuation, accounting, and taxation topics.