Sponsored By

An Empowering Change in Legislation for Disabled IndividualsAn Empowering Change in Legislation for Disabled Individuals

Two words, one big result.

wheelchair disabled sign
Copyright Matt Cardy, Getty Images

A new law, which took effect on Jan. 1, 2017, opens a door for individuals with disabilities—a door that’s been closed since 1993. When President Obama signed the 21st Century Cures Act (CCA) in late 2016, which, in part, authorizes the establishment of self-settled special needs trusts (SNTs), he corrected a longstanding oversight in existing federal legislation while simultaneously creating an empowering opportunity for individuals with disabilities. The new legislation provides a solution to a big issue for both estate planners and individuals with disabilities, making the option of using an SNT much less cumbersome.

What’s an SNT?

An SNT is a type of irrevocable trust that’s frequently used to hold the assets of a disabled individual who’s receiving Medicaid or other public benefits. Typically, those with disabilities qualify for government assistance, such as Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Medicaid and subsidized housing. Many government assistance programs are “means tested” (or “needs based”). To be eligible to receive means-tested benefits, an individual’s assets and income must be below a certain level. When properly drafted and administered, the assets held in an SNT won’t count against the individual’s asset limits for the purposes of his or her Medicaid or SSI eligibility.

Types of SNTs

In brief, there are three types of SNTs: (1) a first-party trust (sometimes referred to as a “d(4)(a) trust" or simply a “special-needs trust”); (2) a third-party trust (sometimes referred to as a “supplemental-needs trust”); and (3) a pooled trust.  A first-party SNT can be funded only with assets that belong to the disabled beneficiary (such as an inheritance or the settlement proceeds from a lawsuit).  A third-party trust can be funded only with assets belonging to someone other than the disabled beneficiary (such as the beneficiary’s parent or grandparent). A pooled trust can be either a first-party trust or a third-party trust. With a first-party or third-party SNT, the individual establishing the trust may choose an individual or a corporation to serve as trustee. A pooled trust is a trust that’s established by a nonprofit organization, which also serves as trustee. Pooled trust accounts hold assets from many different individuals with disabilities and generally provide reduced administration costs. 

Each type of SNT has other attributes, as well as additional differences, and there are important considerations involved in determining which type of trust vehicle is appropriate in any given scenario. An analysis of these issues is well beyond the scope of this article. Moreover, the key change to special-needs trust law brought about by the CCA applies only to the creation of first-party SNTs.

Key Elements of a First-Party SNT

The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (OBRA-1993), which was codified under 42 U.S.C. Section 1396p(d)(4), et seq., authorizes the use of trusts created with assets of an individual who receives public benefits without sacrificing the government assistance received. Under Section 1396p(d)(4), the following conditions must be met to create a first-party SNT:

  • The beneficiary of the trust must be a “disabled” individual as defined by the Social Security Act (SSA)

  • The beneficiary of the trust must be under the age of 65 when the trust is established

  • The trust must be established by the disabled beneficiary’s parent, grandparent, legal guardian or a court

  • The trust must be funded solely with the disabled beneficiary’s own assets

  • The trust must include language providing that at the disabled individual’s death, any remaining trust funds will first be used to reimburse the state for Medicaid paid on his or her behalf

In addition to those mentioned above, the law places many other restrictions and prohibitions on the language used in the provisions of an SNT and regarding how and for what purposes the trust assets can be distributed.1 For example, another important requirement in the administration of an SNT is that any distributions from the trust must be for the sole benefit of the disabled beneficiary. It’s important for drafting attorneys and trustees to familiarize themselves with all of the laws and rules governing the creation and administration of SNTs.

Oversight in OBRA-1993

Unfortunately, a drafting oversight in OBRA-1993 occurred, in which it assumes an individual with a disability doesn’t have the required mental capacity to enter into contract and create his or her own trust. No mechanism was provided for those individuals who do have the required capacity to independently establish their own self-settled trust. That left those disabled individuals without living parents, grandparents or a legal guardian caught in a burdensome process to establish a self-settled SNT. It required obtaining counsel and initiating court proceedings to have a court authorize the creation of the trust on behalf of the disabled individual. In addition to being costly and time-consuming for a disabled individual who had the requisite capacity to act independently, this requirement takes away decision-making powers from those who are self-sufficient in many other aspects of their life. As drafted, OBRA-1993 required those with disabilities to rely on others to advocate for their needs in the creation of an SNT.

The Solution

Section 5007 of the CCA, Fairness in Medicaid Supplemental Needs Trusts, includes the necessary language that addresses the unfairness and impracticability caused by OBRA-1993's not allowing individuals with disabilities to create their own self-settled SNTs. Section 5007 amends Section 1917(d)(4)(A) of the SSA (42 U.S.C. 1396p(d)(4)(A)) by adding the words “the individual” after “for the benefit of such individual by.” These two important words empower mentally competent individuals with disabilities to create their own SNTs without having to work through a parent, grandparent, legal guardian or the court to create the self-settled trust.

Endnote

1. See, e.g., Social Security’s Program Operations Manual System. Many states have statutes that specifically address special-needs trusts as well.

About the Authors

Matthew J. Frerichs

Principal, Robins Kaplan LLP

Matthew Frerichs practices in the Estate and Trust arena, focusing on estate planning, trust and estate administration, guardianship and conservatorship law, and estate and trust litigation. Matt’s technical knowledge and experience in complex planning, combined with his ability to sensitively and conscientiously navigate difficult and often complex family dynamics, gives clients peace of mind that their legacy is secure. Prior to joining Robins Kaplan LLP, Matthew was an associate at a Minnesota law firm practicing in the areas of estate planning, probate, real estate, and business law.

A frequent speaker and writer, Matt has particular experience presenting on risk mitigation in estate planning and on the ethical issues that attorneys face when working with clients with mental illness or diminished capacity.

Matt previously served as a Law Clerk to the Honorable Sean C. Gibbs of the Minnesota District Court. He received a B.A. and an M.S.W. from the University of St. Thomas, and earned his J.D. from the University of St. Thomas School of Law. He continues to support the school’s mission through his participation in the St. Thomas Mentor Program.

He can be reached at [email protected]

Sarah J. Khoury

Staff Attorney, Robins Kaplan LLP

Sarah Khoury is an attorney in Robins Kaplan's Business Litigation Group in Minneapolis, concentrating her practice on estates and trusts. Sarah has spent her legal career representing clients in tax, business, trust, and estate matters with an emphasis in estate planning and the employment of advanced estate planning techniques. Sarah works to develop lifelong relationships with clients centered on designing personalized estate plans reflecting her clients’ unique goals and values, shaped by their particular set of circumstances.

While in law school, Sarah was a certified student attorney in the Michigan State College of Law Immigration Law Clinic. While in the Clinic, she provided representation to indigent refugees and immigrants to secure legal status in the United States. Sarah also served as a law clerk to the Honorable Rosemarie Aquilina of the Ingham County 30th Judicial Circuit Court. Sarah was a member of the Journal of Animal and Natural Resource Law, the Student Bar Association, and the Middle Eastern Student Association.