![sharpejan17 sharpejan17](https://eu-images.contentstack.com/v3/assets/bltabaa95ef14172c61/blt35352143a7e91d97/67336930f0a6e9c4544a66e1/sharpejan17.jpg?width=1280&auto=webp&quality=95&format=jpg&disable=upscale)
Insofar as philanthropic planning is concerned, 2016 was a year for debate on the future of charitable income tax incentives and the tax ramifications for private foundations, donor-advised funds (DAFs) and other charitable planning vehicles.
During the lengthy presidential campaign, the major candidates proposed a number of tax reform plans that would serve to make charitable giving more or less attractive, depending on one’s income level, the amount and nature of their itemized deductions and other factors. Now that the dust has settled, here’s what we’re left with.
Summarizing the Alternatives
In a nutshell, Hillary Clinton’s plan would have kept standard deductions relatively low and capped itemized deductions, with the exception of the...
Unlock All Access Premium Subscription
Get Trusts & Estates articles, digital editions, and an optional print subscription. Choose your subscription now and dive into expert insights today!
Already Subscribed?