Each December we publish a list of investment themes that we feel are critical to the coming year.

Here are our themes for 2014:

  1. The US stock market continues its bull run.

Rationale: We continue to believe that the U.S. stock market may be in the midst of one of the biggest bull markets of our careers. It seems odd to us that investors seem to disregard the existence of a stock market cycle despite that the rotations and leadership in the U.S. market have followed the normal historical pattern. Indicators that have historically been reliable forecasters of bear markets still seem quite benign. The yield curve remains positively sloped, valuation appears normal for this point in the cycle, and sentiment remains very attractive according to our models. Although stocks in 2014 might not provide returns as high as those during 2013, the U.S. stock market’s return might be above average in 2014.

  1. Japan outperforms emerging markets – the currency wars begin.

Rationale: As of the date of this report, the Nikkei 225’s YTD total return of roughly 53% has far outpaced the MSCI Emerging Market’s -1%. We think Japan may outperform emerging markets again during 2014. The aftershocks of the global credit bubble (i.e., massive global overcapacity and falling productivity in the emerging markets) could result in currency wars. Our bullishness on Japan in 2013 was based on a falling yen, and we think Japan may be the first country to recognize that countries must compete on price (i.e., depreciating currency) in the absence of improving demographics and productivity. Although consensus return expectations for Japan do not seem conservative, we still believe that investors have yet to fully recognize the significant structural headwinds facing the emerging markets.

  1. European small-cap stocks lead global equity performance.

Rationale: The European economic recovery has lagged the U.S. during this cycle, which is typical by historical standards. Smaller-capitalization stocks tend to lead markets during most early-cycle periods. In addition, smaller-capitalization European stocks currently have the world’s strongest 12-month earnings growth forecast1, yet few investors seem aware of these growth prospects.

  1. High-yield municipals lead the bond market.

Rationale: We like to search for gaps between perception and reality, and there seems to be a wide gap regarding municipal bondfundamentals. Whereas investors seem quite wary of municipals, municipal finances are generally getting stronger. Investors also seem very concerned that interest rates will rise, but an increase in interest rates may actually improve pension funding status (the present value of future liabilities shrinks as interest rates rise). Because of such factors, high-yield municipal bonds might lead bond market performance during 2014.

  1. Gold falls below $1,000.

Rationale: Investors often think of gold as a hedge against inflation, and history suggests that abnormally high inflation rates are often stimulated by strong credit growth. However, the global credit bubble is deflating, and developed economies’ inflation rates have continued to fall without credit’s fuel. We can understand Yen-based investors’ interest in gold as the Japanese economy reflates (see #2), but we think US-dollar based investors should emphasize financial assets rather than real assets like gold. In USD terms, we think gold will continue its bear market, and could fall below $1,000/oz.

  1. The American Industrial RenaissanceTM2 continues.

Rationale: Smaller, domestically focused U.S. industrial and manufacturing companies have been gaining market share, and we think that trend is likely to continue. Energy costs, productivity, transportation costs, quality control, political stability, and labor costs are some of the contributing factors. Despite the significant outperformance of these small- and mid-cap companies in 2013, we feel the investment theme remains in its early stages and expect the theme to outperform again in 2014.

  1. The Fed stays on hold much longer than investors expect.

Rationale: Contrary to popular belief, the Fed has historically been a lagging, not a leading, indicator. The Fed has said that policy changes will be “data-dependent” during this cycle (what exactly were they in past cycles if not data-dependent?), and we interpret that to mean that Fed policy changes may lag more than they did in previous cycles. The fear of replaying 2008 is not only still central in investors’ minds, it is apparently still central to the Fed’s decisions. If our assertions are correct, then stock market valuations could be higher and
volatility could be lower than investors currently expect.

  1. Investors realize that the term “Liquid Alts” may be an oxymoron.

Rationale: During the early-1990s, I argued that illiquidity was one of the reasons alternative investments outperformed. Investors did not have ready access to their funds, and had to receive higher returns than available in liquid investments as compensation for taking illiquidity risk. Within that context, the term “liquid alternatives” seems like an oxymoron. Basic financial theory suggests that liquid alternatives should provide inferior return/risk potential versus illiquid alternatives. Ongoing fears of replaying 2008’s bear market suggest to us that investors may be paying too much for liquidity, and that liquid alternatives’ returns could be inferior to those of plain old-fashioned stocks.

  1. The king has no clothes: high-quality stocks underperform.

Rationale: Many investors believe that quality stocks outperform over the long term. We believe there is little objective data to support that contention. Rather, our research shows there is substantial evidence that “bad” (low quality) companies have historically tended to produce attractive returns over the long term. Much like in #7 and #8 above, 2008’s lingering fears have led investors toward more conservative, higher quality stocks. We think that trend might reverse during 2014.

  1. Small banks.

Rationale: Bubbles create capacity that typically isn’t needed once the bubble deflates. The expansion of bank balance sheets was the capacity created during the credit bubble. Larger banks’ balance sheets ballooned during the credit bubble, but their balance sheets have yet to fully contract. Smaller bank balance sheets seem much better aligned to the postbubble credit world. The S&P SmallCap 600 Bank index outperformed the S&P 500 Bank index by roughly 15 percentage points so far during 2013. We anticipate smaller banks to again outperform larger banks in 2014.


1Source: Richard Bernstein Advisors LLC, Factset, MSCI, IBES Consensus analyst forecast

2The American Industrial Renaissance theme is based on US small and mid-cap industrial and manufacturing companies whose businesses are US-centric (i.e., typically no more than 25% foreign sales). This could be the best growth story in the world right now, in the opinion of Richard Bernstein Advisors LLC. Our opinion is that these companies are gaining market share because of competitive labor costs, energy costs, transportation and distribution costs, and quality control. Large multinational companies do not fit because they are often attempting to grow in the emerging markets. Such growth strategies seem to ignore the myriad of problems cropping up in the emerging world.

The following descriptions, while believed to be accurate, are in some cases abbreviated versions of more detailed or comprehensive definitions available from the sponsors or originators of the respective indices. Anyone interested in such further details is free to consult each such sponsor’s or originator’s website.

The past performance of an index is not a guarantee of future results.

Each index reflects an unmanaged universe of securities without any deduction for advisory fees or other expenses that would reduce actual returns, as well as the reinvestment of all income and dividends. An actual investment in the securities included in the index would require an investor to incur transaction costs, which would lower the performance results. Indices are not actively managed and investors cannot invest directly in the indices.

EM: MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Index. The MSCI EM Index is a free-float-adjusted, market-capitalization-weighted index designed to measure the equity-market performance of emerging markets.

Japan: The Nikkei 225 Index. The Nikkei-225 Stock Average is a price-weighted index comprised of 225 top-rated Japanese companies listed in the First Section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange.

S&P SmallCap 600® Banks Index: The Standard and Poor's SmallCap® 600 Banks Index is a capitalization-weighted index. The index was developed with a base value of 100 as of December 31, 1993. This is a GICS Level 2 Industry group.

S&P 500® Banks Index: The Standard and Poor's 500® Banks Index is a capitalization-weighted index. The index was developed with a base level of 10 for the 1941-43 base periods. This is a GICS Level 2 Industry group.

©Copyright 2013 Richard Bernstein Advisors LLC. All rights reserved.

Unless otherwise stated, index returns do not reflect the effect of any applicable sales charges, commissions, expenses, taxes or leverage, as applicable. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Historical performance of the index illustrates market trends and does not represent the past or future performance of any fund.

About Risk
Equity: Investments are sensitive to stock market volatility. Foreign: Investments in foreign instruments or currencies can involve greater risk and volatility than U.S. investments because of adverse market, economic, political, regulatory, geopolitical, or other conditions. Emerging Markets: In emerging countries, these risks may be more significant. Commodity: The value of commodities investments will generally be affected by overall market movements and factors specific to a particular industry or commodity including weather, embargoes, tariffs, or health, political, international and regulatory developments. Income market: An imbalance in supply and demand in the income market may result in valuation uncertainties and greater volatility, less liquidity, widening credit spreads and a lack of price transparency in the market. Interest Rate: As interest rates rise, the value of certain income investments is likely to decline. Credit: Investments in income securities may be affected by changes in the creditworthiness of the issuer and are subject to the risk of non-payment of principal and interest. The value of income securities also may decline because of real or perceived concerns about the issuer’s ability to make principal and interest payments. Smaller Companies: Smaller companies are generally subject to greater price fluctuations, limited liquidity, higher transaction costs and higher investment risk than larger, established companies. Derivatives: Derivatives instruments can be used to take both long and short positions, be highly volatile, result in economic leverage (which can magnify losses), and involve risks in addition to the risks of the underlying instrument on which the derivative is based, such as counterparty, correlation and liquidity risk. If a counterparty is unable to honor its commitments, the value may decline and/or the investment could experience delays in the return of collateral or other assets held by the counterparty.

The following information was prepared by and has been reprinted with the permission of Richard Bernstein Advisors LLC. The views expressed herein are those of Richard Bernstein Advisors LLC. Information provided and views expressed are current only through the date stated on top of each page (November 2013). The opinions herein are not necessarily those of the Eaton Vance organization and may change at any time without notice. The information contained herein has been provided for informational and illustrative purposes only and is not intended to be, nor should it be considered, investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any particular security. Investors should consult an investment professional prior to making any investment decision. While information is believed to be reliable, no assurance is being provided as to its accuracy or completeness.

The information in this material may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance Fund. It is not to be construed as representative of any Fund’s underlying allocation. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. This Insight may contain statements that are not historical facts, referred to as forward-looking statements. Future results may differ significantly from those stated in forward-looking statements, depending on factors such as changes in securities or financial markets or general economic conditions.

Nothing contained herein constitutes tax, legal, insurance or investment advice, or the recommendation of or an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy or invest in, any investment product, vehicle, service or instrument. Such an offer or solicitation may only be made by delivery to a prospective investor of formal offering materials, including subscription or account documents or forms, which include detailed discussions of the terms of the respective product, vehicle, service or instrument, including the principal risk factors that might impact such a purchase or investment, and which should be reviewed carefully by any such investor before making the decision to invest. Specifically, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, before acquiring the shares of any mutual fund, it is your responsibility to read the fund’s prospectus. Links to appearances and articles by Richard Bernstein, whether in the press, on television or otherwise, are provided for informational purposes only and in no way should be considered a recommendation of any particular investment product, vehicle, service or instrument or the rendering of investment advice, which must always be evaluated by a prospective investor in consultation with his or her own financial adviser and in light of his or her own circumstances, including the investor’s investment horizon, appetite for risk, and ability to withstand a potential loss of some or all of an investment’s value. Investing is an inherently risky activity, and investors must always be prepared to potentially lose some or all of an investment’s value. Past performance is, of course, no guarantee of future results.

Richard Bernstein Advisors LLC serves as subadvisor to two Eaton Vance mutual funds.

Richard Bernstein is chief executive officer of Richard Bernstein Advisors LLC, a registered investment advisor.

For more information on Richard Bernstein Funds, click here or visit eatonvance.com/Bernstein. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of a mutual fund. This and other important information is contained in the prospectus and summary prospectus, which can be obtained from a financial advisor. Prospective investors should read the prospectus carefully before investing.