Skip navigation

A Dumont-like Horror

Stock concentration cases against fiduciaries just keep getting scarier. The latest fright comes from Hamilton County, Ohio. If the New York case of Dumontsent chills down advisors' spines, Ohio's Fifth Third Bank v. Firstar Bank, No. C-050518 (Sept. 1, 2006), should give them nightmares. In Dumont, the fiduciary had years to diversify a portfolio and failed to do so, despite a beneficiary's entreaties.
Resources

Stock concentration cases against fiduciaries just keep getting scarier.

All access premium subscription

Please Log in if you are currently a Trusts & Estates subscriber.


If you are interested in becoming a subscriber with unlimited article access, please select Subscription Options below.


Questions about your account or how to access content?


Contact: [email protected]

Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish