Hilary, scmilary

17 replies [Last post]
larmisk's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-05-04

I would like all those thinking about voting for Hilary, or have clients thinking about voting for her, to listen up!
The main responsibility of the Executive Branch of the Federal Government is to PROTECT this county!!!!  After listening to what Hilary had to say to the Pentagon AND the Pentagon's retort to Hilary, is there any doubt in your minds that she would NOT do the job?  She is so anti-military it makes you wonder whether or not she has the moral fortitude to do the job.  
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, flys like a duck, etc.,etc., it must be a duck!!!!!
She is definitely NOT the person for the job!!!!
 

troll's picture
Offline
Joined: 2004-11-29

larmisk wrote:
I would like all those thinking about voting for Hilary, or have clients thinking about voting for her, to listen up!
The main responsibility of the Executive Branch of the Federal Government is to PROTECT this county!!!!  After listening to what Hilary had to say to the Pentagon AND the Pentagon's retort to Hilary, is there any doubt in your minds that she would NOT do the job?  She is so anti-military it makes you wonder whether or not she has the moral fortitude to do the job.  
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, flys like a duck, etc.,etc., it must be a duck!!!!!
She is definitely NOT the person for the job!!!!
 

Hillary is an unindicted felon.

troll's picture
Offline
Joined: 2004-11-29

Thank you Lamisk. I had no idea before but now you've cleared it all up.
Also thanks for reminding me that I posted over at the NYT about this, I gotta go see what happened (probably nothing).

Dust Bunny's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-05-07

Bobby Hull wrote:larmisk wrote:
I would like all those thinking about voting for Hilary, or have clients thinking about voting for her, to listen up!
The main responsibility of the Executive Branch of the Federal Government is to PROTECT this county!!!!  After listening to what Hilary had to say to the Pentagon AND the Pentagon's retort to Hilary, is there any doubt in your minds that she would NOT do the job?  She is so anti-military it makes you wonder whether or not she has the moral fortitude to do the job.  
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, flys like a duck, etc.,etc., it must be a duck!!!!!
She is definitely NOT the person for the job!!!!
 

Hillary is an unindicted felon.

And a committed Socialist and a faux feminist.  I would vote for Pee Wee Herman first.

Ashland's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-03-07

So what you're saying is that we shouldn't have contingency plans for when things go wrong???

Clients must love ya'll!

I am will not be voting for Hillary during the primary, either, but not for that reason.

My question is: What the heck is Mitt Romney talking about??? He says age-appropriate sex education shouldn't be available in kindergarten. Yet he did nothing to repeal Mass's sex education program that started in PRE-SCHOOL when he governor. FLIP FLOP!

troll's picture
Offline
Joined: 2004-11-29

Ashland wrote:So what you're saying is that we shouldn't have contingency plans for when things go wrong??? Clients must love ya'll! I am will not be voting for Hillary during the primary, either, but not for that reason. My question is: What the heck is Mitt Romney talking about??? He says age-appropriate sex education shouldn't be available in kindergarten. Yet he did nothing to repeal Mass's sex education program that started in PRE-SCHOOL when he governor. FLIP FLOP!
You black guys crack me up.

Ashland's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-03-07

You black guys crack me up.

I'm lightly browned, thank you very much.

farotech's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-01-05

Aren't you some kind of Islamofascist?

Ashland's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-03-07

farotech wrote: Aren't you some kind of Islamofascist?

Yes, and my mother is SOOO proud!

troll's picture
Offline
Joined: 2004-11-29

farotech wrote:Aren't you some kind of Islamofascist?
He's a Sand Slave-American.

Dust Bunny's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-05-07

There is no such thing as "age appropriate sex education" for 4 and 5 year olds.
What the heck is Mitt Romney talking about??? He says age-appropriate sex education shouldn't be available in kindergarten. Yet he did nothing to repeal Mass's sex education program that started in PRE-SCHOOL when he governor. FLIP FLOP
The governor doesn't propose laws.  The legislature does that.  In addition, as a Republican in a state so blue it is indigo, he hardly had the support in the legistlature to repeal existing laws.  You should brush up on your civics lessons.

troll's picture
Offline
Joined: 2004-11-29

What? Was he appointed Governor? Or did he win the election?

troll's picture
Offline
Joined: 2004-11-29

"There is no such thing as "age appropriate sex education" for 4 and 5 year olds."
Children get sex education from the moment they are born. Girls in pink, boys in blue.
Girls and boys are treated differently from day one.
Expectations are different, clothes are different, activities are different, boys get spanked when they do wrong, girls get scolded.
You might not agree with my particular examples and it might have occured to you that these actions are age appropriate sex education. But on further reflection I'm sure you can see where they are being taught what their sex, later they will be taught why their sex, even later they will learn how their sex. 
Meanwhile, Barney has been teaching sex education for years. When we were young parents we used to sing the songs with our daughters about not going away with strangers. I think that was a good idea. It's also sex education of a sort.

Indyone's picture
Offline
Joined: 2005-05-31

Bobby Hull wrote:farotech wrote:Aren't you some kind of Islamofascist?
He's a Sand Slave-American.
Bobby...you're misbehaving again...you off your meds?

troll's picture
Offline
Joined: 2004-11-29

Indyone wrote:Bobby Hull wrote:farotech wrote:Aren't you some kind of Islamofascist?
He's a Sand Slave-American.
Bobby...you're misbehaving again...you off your meds?

Naaaaahhhhh. I left them in the sunlight.

pretzelhead's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-03-23

No Mitt.
No Mo-Mo.

troll's picture
Offline
Joined: 2004-11-29

Ashland wrote:So what you're saying is that we shouldn't have contingency plans for when things go wrong???
No, I'm saying just what the Pentagon said, we have legions of people doing nothing but writing contingency plans, SHE wanted to discuss said plans publicly and debate them. You might as well send the enemy a copy in advance.<?:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

Dust Bunny's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-05-07

Whomitmayconcer wrote:
"There is no such thing as "age appropriate sex education" for 4 and 5 year olds."
Children get sex education from the moment they are born. Girls in pink, boys in blue.
Girls and boys are treated differently from day one.
Expectations are different, clothes are different, activities are different, boys get spanked when they do wrong, girls get scolded.
You might not agree with my particular examples and it might have occured to you that these actions are age appropriate sex education. But on further reflection I'm sure you can see where they are being taught what their sex, later they will be taught why their sex, even later they will learn how their sex. 
Meanwhile, Barney has been teaching sex education for years. When we were young parents we used to sing the songs with our daughters about not going away with strangers. I think that was a good idea. It's also sex education of a sort.

Gender and gender identity is different from sex or education about the mechanics of sex.  I have no idea who Barney is, but there is no reason on earth that 4 and 5 year old children need to be acquainted with sex education or learn the clinical side of the birds and the bees in an institutional setting.  
Teaching children that going off with strangers is a bad idea is not sex education. That's a safety issue.  Same thing with teaching young children that they should not allow people to touch them. 
Sex education and attitudes about what, when, where and how children are taught these things belongs in the parent's sphere of authority.  This is just one more instance of the over reaching Nanny State, Big Momma/Brother knows what's best for you attitude of the Left.   
The Government has no business being in these types of issues.  And  THIS  is the main reason I would vote for a dead dog before I voted for Hillary who exemplifies the worst in the creeping Socialism that is grinding our country down.
 

Please or Register to post comments.

Industry Newsletters
Investment Category Sponsor Links

 

Careers Category Sponsor Links

Sponsored Introduction Continue on to (or wait seconds) ×