Bye, Bye, Bear Stearns?

74 replies [Last post]
doberman's picture
Offline
Joined: 2005-02-22

Today, is a pivot point.
 
I've again increased allocations to funds specializing in US companies with significant overseas operations and markets, foreign dividend-paying stocks, and precious metals.
 
The reason? An internal alarm bell went off when news came out about Bear Stearns and their liquidity problem. Though shocking enough, that wasn't the trigger for the alarm. What was the trigger was that CNBC had interviewed Bears' CEO 2 days ago and he indicated that all was well (generally speaking). I agree with the announcer (a rare event in itself), that the CEO appeared to have no prior knowledge of this problem during the interview. That's what scares me. How many others (ML, SB, Wach, etc.) are sitting on ticking time bombs and they don't know it? The major banks could also be sitting on ticking time bombs, but they have access to the Fed to bail them out without making headlines.
 
Many of you know that I am generally bearish on the US for fundamental reasons. However, I haven't built the bomb shelter (yet) or dumped all my clients' assets into precious metals funds. To do so, at this stage of the game, would be foolish (in my humble opinion) and would incur the wrath of my clients, as well. My game plan is to look for significant sign posts along the way that tell me which way to shift a percentage of assets. 
It's not a science, it's an art. Right or wrong, it makes logical sense to me and many of my clients.
 
My primary fundamental reason for being bearish on the US is that many of the economic stats the market relies upon are flawed...on purpose: CPI, GDP, unemployment, etc. I say "on purpose" because politicians have changed the way econ stats are measured, relying primarily on computer models and whatever was politically expedient at the time. For comparison purposes, employing the old way of measuring the economy says that we are now experiencing a CPI of 10+%, a negative GDP (for 3 quarters in a row), and an unemployment rate of over 10%. (Which stats seems closer to the truth to you, the new or the old?) Relying upon these "flawed" indicators gives a distorted view of the economy, causing all kinds of foreseen and unforeseen problems.
 
However, to panic and dump everything into precious metals now would be a mistake, in my opinion. The market is based on perception, not reality. It could be years before "reality" sets in. So, I've chosen to make defensive allocations as these periodic sign posts pop-up, lending credence to my theory that the economy is fundamentally flawed and unless we come to grips with the "reality" of it, the pain will only continue.
 
Hey, I could be wrong! Do your own due diligence!
 

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous

Dobe, good post, but I do have a few questions:
1.  I understand the argument for allocations to precious metals, and foreign dividend paying stocks.  My question is, "U.S. companies with significant foreign operations and markets" - doesn't that category include just about every large cap, most mid cap, and many small cap companies?  I don't know of (off the top of my head) too many major U.S. companies in the past 5 - 10 years that do a majority of their business in the USA (or even in North America, for that matter).  Just curious about types of companies you are referencing here.

I'm getting pretty darn bearish on the dollar, that's for sure (say it aint so!)...it's a shame that our entire economy, and all of our markets, are going to have to suffer because of the stupidity and irresponsibility of a small percentage of the population and unscrupulous lenders.
 
2.  There is much talk on the forum as of late, about the changes in the way economic indicators are measured.  I read a great deal of allegations about the political conspiracy of changing those measurements to mask the reality of 10% inflation, negative GDP, etc.  Could someone please elaborate on this?  With cold, hard facts, that is...what exactly has been changed, and when?
 
I'm not saying I doubt it, and I'm not saying I concur...I'm just wondering what's changed.

doberman's picture
Offline
Joined: 2005-02-22

iceco1d wrote:
Dobe, good post, but I do have a few questions:
1.  I understand the argument for allocations to precious metals, and foreign dividend paying stocks.  My question is, "U.S. companies with significant foreign operations and markets" - doesn't that category include just about every large cap, most mid cap, and many small cap companies?  I don't know of (off the top of my head) too many major U.S. companies in the past 5 - 10 years that do a majority of their business in the USA (or even in North America, for that matter).  Just curious about types of companies you are referencing here.
I use funds that specialize and/or have a significant portion of their portfolio in such companies. I'm not an analyst, so I use funds that offer a "conservative" approach to picking such stocks. I use those funds that employ all three market caps for investment.
 
 

I'm getting pretty darn bearish on the dollar, that's for sure (say it aint so!)...it's a shame that our entire economy, and all of our markets, are going to have to suffer because of the stupidity and irresponsibility of a small percentage of the population and unscrupulous lenders.
 
Agreed.
 
2.  There is much talk on the forum as of late, about the changes in the way economic indicators are measured.  I read a great deal of allegations about the political conspiracy of changing those measurements to mask the reality of 10% inflation, negative GDP, etc.  Could someone please elaborate on this?  With cold, hard facts, that is...what exactly has been changed, and when?
 
Suggest you go to www.shadowstats.com . They offer a free archive that explains the history and shows you everything but current stats (that requires subscription). Note: you'll need a basic understanding of economics to get their point. Yeah, I don't care for the website name (too conspiratorial), but wha' cha' gonna do?
 
I'm not saying I doubt it, and I'm not saying I concur...I'm just wondering what's changed.

 
I could be wrong....

Jonzed's picture
Offline
Joined: 2004-11-30

I grow tire of your Bear'istic views Doberman. Look back at your 1100+ posts...its grows tiresome

Dark Knight's picture
Offline
Joined: 2008-01-30

Are we to the point of maximum pessimism yet?  Perhaps, perhaps not.  I think we are getting close either way.

Ashland's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-03-07

I've been moving people to more aggressive allocations for about 2 - 3 weeks now. A little early to be sure, but I don't think it's too early. The research I've done suggests that when you believe you're past halfway to the bottom, you make a lot of money by doing so.

fastcar's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-02-21

Jonzed,
We'll, be prepare to get much more tiresome..as it spreads to the main stream media...years and years to go my friend

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous

fastcar wrote: Jonzed,
We'll, be prepare to get much more tiresome..as it spreads to the main stream media...years and years to go my friend

Ah mr F430 rears his lying head. Welcome back Piker.

fastcar's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-02-21

doberman,
Lehman is next...

troll's picture
Offline
Joined: 2004-11-29

Anyone hear that UBS is selling its brokerage.  An advisor in my office announced it yesterday as I was leaving the office  but I cannot find confirmation.  If true, that would be a very bad sign for UBS.

fastcar's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-02-21

That is the rumor.....although we have:
 
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aZ_.7LAjh04w
 
 

troll's picture
Offline
Joined: 2004-11-29

It would be interesting if this rumor is in fact true due to the fact that UBS tried to buy AGE before Wachovia.  If the rumor is true, that would highlight how fast the mighty have fallen.

doberman's picture
Offline
Joined: 2005-02-22

Jonzed wrote:I grow tire of your Bear'istic views Doberman. Look back at your 1100+ posts...its grows tiresome
 
Ohhh gee, well uhhh, how 'bout I run'em by ya before I post'em, sport?
 
Seriously though, agree / disagree whatever. I try to be realistic by determining the facts of a situation and then applying my opinion as to the outcome. That's what your clients pay you for. Simply selling your clients on your optimism for the future is doing them a disservice. You're optimistic, fine. Now, tell me why, using facts and figures that back-up that opinion. (Refer to Indyone's posts as examples.)
 
Now, why is this important to you? Because if I ever met one of your clients and you're a "gee-whiz"-type of broker, you'd lose the account. "Gee-whiz" brokers are a dime-a-dozen and will lose their accounts to brokers who have facts to back-up their opinion, everytime. 
 
Besides, having a factual, logical reason for doing what you did for a client, might save your b*tt in arbitration.
 
Just sayin'....
 

Indyone's picture
Offline
Joined: 2005-05-31

Thanks, Dobe...you're my favorite bear...;-)

You at least aren't in the "we're in a depression" crowd yet, and you do tend to stay factual, which I also appreciate. What Bear and others are going through right now will end up serving a valuable lesson, much as the internet bubble did. The only question here is how deep do the problems run and how quickly will they be behind us. I'm probably more optimistic than you in that regard, due to P/E retios and the number of industries that remain relatively unaffected at this point.

As the number two posting junkie here, I hereby grant you unlimited posting privileges to act as my counterbalance.

doberman's picture
Offline
Joined: 2005-02-22

Indyone wrote:Thanks, Dobe...you're my favorite bear...;-) You at least aren't in the "we're in a depression" crowd yet, and you do tend to stay factual, which I also appreciate. What Bear and others are going through right now will end up serving a valuable lesson, much as the internet bubble did. The only question here is how deep do the problems run and how quickly will they be behind us. I'm probably more optimistic than you in that regard, due to P/E retios and the number of industries that remain relatively unaffected at this point. As the number two posting junkie here, I hereby grant you unlimited posting privileges to act as my counterbalance.
 
Thank you. (Knowing Indyone is posting from some swanky penthouse, beachfront hotel room overlooking scantily clad spring breakers frolicking on the sand. "Wanna play a little volleyball broker-boy?")

doberman's picture
Offline
Joined: 2005-02-22

This just in: Bear Stearns is history and their shareholders are getting a shower. JP Morgan is buying Bear for $2/share. (No misprint) Bear closed at $30 on Friday and on Monday JP Morgan is buying it for $2/share. WOW!!

The link says it all:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,338306,00.html
 

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous

Da*n, you beat me to it!  Pretty freakin' crazy IMO. 

bondo's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-04-15

Amazing is the only way I can describe that.

Ashland's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-03-07

Asia's down only 2%... Let's see how we do tomorrow. 2 - 3% down day?

nestegg's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-06-14

Wow...just wow!

josephjones107's picture
Offline
Joined: 2004-12-20

Bear closed at $30 on Friday. JP Morgan bascially says we'll pay $2 a share and Bear agrees.   This is unbelievable. Because Bear agreed to this you have to think they weren't just having short term liquidity problems.

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous

Yea, but Bear closed @ 30 on Friday BEFORE the run on them this weekend...still a crazy situation, none-the-less. 
 
By the way, I'm officially adopting the position that the Fed needs to raise interest rates to turn this thing around (for reasons I won't go into on this thread).

Ashland's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-03-07

ice - are you thinking that businesses will invest the cash on their balance sheets if they're told their WACC's will increase soon? While I respect this thought process, it's nuts because Bear's failure(and the current financial crisis in general) is caused by tight credit markets. An increase in interest rates is necessary to support the $ and to slow inflation, not to cause investment. There's not a direct correlation.

While I prefer these term credit facilities & discount rate cuts to lowering the fed funds rate - I don't think we need lower cd, mmkt, credit card & HELOC rates - I support fed cuts, and strongly believe they need to get to wherever they're going & to indicate that they're done cutting. This will support investment and will also loosen the credit markets.

Yeah, I'm not going to attempt to fix that run on sentence.

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous

Haha.  That was quite a run-on...but this aint no spellin' n grammar forum!  JK.
Actually, without hijacking this thread too much, my call for higher interest rates is grounded in my belief that much of our real economic problems are hinged upon the dollar.
Our economy needs a strong dollar because, well, we don't build chit here.  Most of the people I know are hurting right now because too much of their budget goes to put gas in their car and heat in their house.  Strengthen the dollar, and those problems ease (gas would be under $2/gallon if the dollar went back to its value at the turn of the century).  And if you ask me, $1.75 gas would put a heck of a lot of money into other sectors of the economy.  So would sub-$2 heating oil.
 
Now what would higher interest rates mean for the credit crisis?  Well, a lot of people would lose their homes, and possibly their cars, and some other significant assets.  And yea, a fair amount of financial institutions would fold.  But that's the point of capitalism; the elite are rewarded, and inferior suffer.  Tough sh!t at this point.  I don't need to reiterate my POV on that issue. 
 
In short, we need to cut the dead weight (errr, dead beats!).  Seriously, time for this country to cut its losses and get lean and mean again.  Stop printing money to bail out these suckers.  Increase rates, kill inflation, stablize the dollar against the Euro, and get back to business already.
 
I KNOW that isn't going to happen, because the powers that be would have to literally say "f*ck you" to the morons.  And I don't think, "To save the economy, and avoid prolonging this recession with bandaids, the people that screwed up are going to have to be homeless/car-less/job-less, etc., and they are going to suffer."  Supporting that POV doesn't get you elected, or appointed, and it won't happen. 
 
So guess what guys: for being a part of the responsible part of the population, you get to prop up these losers in all sorts of ways you don't realize.  You pay more for ydur cars, your computers, gas, oil, kerosene, diesel, food, and on and on and on, just so we can prop up these idiots with money that didn't exist last week.
 
Don't worry though, you won't have to be concerned about alien banks and investors taking your dollars; with the discount rate @ 3.25% and headed south (along with the Fed Funds rate), no one else on this planet wants your dollars. 
 
That's just the tip of my thought process iceberg, but I've already dribbled on more than I originally wanted to in this thread.
 
 

fastcar's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-02-21

Im glad with your 4 month in the industry, you went from bull to bear.  Congrats!

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous

FastCar, I've been in production since August, and that means absolutely nothing in regards to this conversation.  You, my friend, cannot even stand in the same room with me, or any other permanent member on this forum. 
 
I don't generally resort to this type of discussion...but I have a B.S. in Finance, and another in Business Law (graduated cum laude, no less).  I have an MBA that had a concentration in finance & capital markets.  And I'll be starting my Ph.D in finance (@ Smeal) 1/09 (I'd start 9/08, but I'm getting married this summer).
 
I don't wear that sh!t on my hat on this forum, because from a SALES perspective, it means very little.  From a conversation regarding macroeconomics, and if you want to call out my tenure as an FA as a means to belittle my POV, it is quite relevant. 
 
BTW, while we are laying everything on the table, I started a multi-$MM grossing company in between my soph/junior years of undergrad, while you were probably getting hazed by your frat brothers during pledging, and drinking $8/case beer from red plastic cups.  Oh, and yea, I have the toys to prove it, unlike you and your F430 wet dreams. 
 
Talk all the smack on this forum you want; I've forgotten more about economics than you know, and I've lost more money at the Borgata than you'll make this year.  $77MM AUM...still waiting for pics of your F430.
 
You my friend, are a complete tool, and a loser...I feel like I lost a bit of dignity just providing you with a response.  I KNOW I lose a few brain cells everytime I read one of your posts.  Seriously champ, get a life. 
 
PS- I never said I was a bear.
 

Indyone's picture
Offline
Joined: 2005-05-31

Well, this morning's open should be interesting to say the least.  Perhaps this is the event that gives us enough capitulation to bring the last sellers to the market.

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous

iceco1d wrote: FastCar, I've been in production since August, and that means absolutely nothing in regards to this conversation.  You, my friend, cannot even stand in the same room with me, or any other permanent member on this forum. 
 
I don't generally resort to this type of discussion...but I have a B.S. in Finance, and another in Business Law (graduated cum laude, no less).  I have an MBA that had a concentration in finance & capital markets.  And I'll be starting my Ph.D in finance (@ Smeal) 1/09 (I'd start 9/08, but I'm getting married this summer).
 
I don't wear that sh!t on my hat on this forum, because from a SALES perspective, it means very little.  From a conversation regarding macroeconomics, and if you want to call out my tenure as an FA as a means to belittle my POV, it is quite relevant. 
 
BTW, while we are laying everything on the table, I started a multi-$MM grossing company in between my soph/junior years of undergrad, while you were probably getting hazed by your frat brothers during pledging, and drinking $8/case beer from red plastic cups.  Oh, and yea, I have the toys to prove it, unlike you and your F430 wet dreams. 
 
Talk all the smack on this forum you want; I've forgotten more about economics that you know, and I've lost more money at the Borgata than you'll make this year.  $77MM AUM...still waiting for pics of your F430.
 
You my friend, are a complete tool, and a loser...I feel like I lost a bit of dignity just providing you with a response.  I KNOW I lose a few brain cells everytime I read one of your posts.  Seriously champ, get a life. 
 
PS- I never said I was a bear.
 

OWNED

Ashland's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-03-07

Quote: my call for higher interest rates is grounded in my belief that much of our real economic problems are hinged upon the dollar.

I agree we need a strong - or at least stronger - currency. This will be taken care of in the next year, though. I strongly believe this is a financial rather than an economic crisis & will be over by year's end. So, while the drop in the dollar is scary, it will be reversed in short order. Also, it's highly likely that other countries will move to support the dollar or decrease their rates to stay competitive. I read the ECB & Bank of England's reluctance to lower rates as an indication that they see this weak dollar as a short term event.

Ashland's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-03-07

Indyone wrote: Well, this morning's open should be interesting to say the least.  Perhaps this is the event that gives us enough capitulation to bring the last sellers to the market.

I sure hope it will. Is that going to be at 11,200 or 10,200, though?

fastcar's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-02-21

Ice, Oh...sorry...7 months experience.   I've read your posts.  You have no clue.  A permanent member of this forum..one should be so proud. 
 
Lay it on the table...AUM.....toys......come on...bring it on.

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous

Ash, I have a couple questions for you then (serious, please don't take any of this as sarcasm or hostile, those comments are strictly meant for FastCar, I just enjoy other POVs).
 
Why do you feel the dollar will strengthen over the next year?  I can't see any reason why it would (significantly).  Other markets (especially Asia) have their own concerns about inflation.  I'm not jumping on the recent weak-dollar records bandwagon here...I'm concerned about the systematic trouncing of the dollar over the past 5 years. 
 
Do I want to see an overvalued dollar?  Not particularly.  Do we need the superpower of currencies?  Nope.  But at this point, the dollar is my primary concern; it hasn't been a short-term phenomenon, and I don't see anything to contradict that (I hope I'm wrong).
 
As far as financial vs economic crisis...I think we have both.  The financial crisis needs to happen.  Band-aid it all you want; that's all it is.  I'm lobbying to remove the props and band-aids so we can get back to "normal" in this country.  I think many of the end-of-days predictions are waaaay overboard.  It's going to suck more for some than others, but it's going to happen one way or another.
 
The economic portion of the crisis, IMO, is still all dollar-related.  My opinion isn't just based on numbers, but on what I hear/see from clients, friends, family, and people in general.  People aren't spending money on discretionary items because they are putting it in their gas tanks and their furnaces (and some other problem goods/services). 
 
By the way...the gas is going into big, V8, gas-hog SUVs, that many of these twits have negative equity in and couldn't really afford in the first place.  Just like the furnaces are heating houses that were well beyond their means as well.  Nifty situation eh?

STFU's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-06-29

fastcar wrote: Ice, Oh...sorry...7 months experience.   I've read your posts.  You have no clue.  A permanent member of this forum..one should be so proud. 
 
Lay it on the table...AUM.....toys......come on...bring it on.

Are you going to post pictures of your F430 or Shut the FU

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous

fastcar wrote:Ice, Oh...sorry...7 months experience.   I've read your posts.  You have no clue.  A permanent member of this forum..one should be so proud. 
 
Lay it on the table...AUM.....toys......come on...bring it on.
 
Lay it on the table?  Sure, and I'll even go first for ya. 
 
AUM?  Not much man.  Less than 5MM.  No worries though, that will change.  Remember, I'm doing this because I like it, and because it's something I always wanted  to do.  Same thing from an academic standpoint.  I'm naturally driven, but by no means under any gun.  I was netting well into the six-figure range and I was barely old enough to drink. 
 
Nevertheless, you want to talk about toys?  I'll post first, you pick what you want.  Cars?  I already posted about my 03 350Z; but I'd be happy to post a pic of my 07 Tundra as well if you'd like.  Heck, I have an 02 Hyundai Santa Fe for a beater too if you wanna see that also (don't worry, it's loaded, for a Hyundai anyway).  You want to post car for car?  With a printout of this thread laying on the hood?  No prob. 
 
What else do you want to compare?  Both of my living rooms are decked with 65" HDTV, leather sectionals, and no less than 1200W surround sounds (along with all the typical 20-something toys; XBox 360, PS3, etc...although, I don't really use them much).  What else do you want to compare champ?  Whatcha wanna see?  Hot tub?  My fiance's rock?  My house from the outside?  Want me to film a virtual tour of my property?  You name it buddy.
 
But with this understanding...I'll post my rides first, with this thread in the pic...you respond, in kind, with your F430, or leave.  Permanently. 
Got a deal big mouth? 
 
Disclaimer:  I really don't enjoy being an asshole...but this guy is just too much of a tool to pass up.  I'm done mouth-battling with you; either agree to come out from behind your anonymous internet-baller mantra and put-up, or shut-up.

fastcar's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-02-21

WOW...for a 26year old overweight boy...lots of toys...go ahead and post up all your pictures first!
STFU=Ferris Bueller
 
 
more like 1.5mm..as I hear through the grapevine.

Ashland's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-03-07

Good question, Ice. I think the dollar's fall has been overdone. The world is pricing in a long-term financial decline that I don't believe the US is in for.

Please see http://www.metaquotes.net/forex/eurusd

Other examples of mispricing:

Oil prices in the early 1970's.
http://inflationdata.com/Inflation/images/charts/Oil/Inflation_Adj_Oil_Prices_Chart.htm

That spike in the 1970's was very scary because it was expected to last forever, but it didn't.

Mortgage rates just this year(I locked in btw!!!)
http://www.bankrate.com/brm/graphs/graph_trend.asp

There's talk on CNBC World(I'm an insomniac & watch that crap if I can't sleep) that the Euro is 30% overvalued against the $.

The second reason the dollar will increase is that world sells to the US as it has never before. Other central banks will be put under a great deal of pressure to stabilize the currency by lowering their interest rates.

Both of these arguments have circumstantial evidence at the moment. I think there will be a confirmation of this by the third quarter of this year. Confirmation being a drop in rates at the ECB & Bank of England as well a loosening in the credit markets that will lead to greater US business investment.

Crossing fingers because I'm buying for clients right now while the rest of you are freaking...

Ashland's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-03-07

Don't feed the troll.

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous

I'm not even going to entertain most of your post.  Do we have a deal or no?  Do you think you can turn off Bloomberg long enough tomorrow to take a picture of that bad boy?
By the way, A+ job on the ole' reading comprehension champ; even if you were right about 1.5MM (which you aren't), but I think that would qualify as less than 5MM.  Maybe I need to go double check that, but I'm pretty sure I'm right.  Maybe you should go figure out how you are going to photochop your 1:24 discast F430 into the real thing by tomorrow night. 
 
Don't worry, I'm sure someone in your Intro to MIS/CIS class can help you tomorrow. 
 
PS- Thanks for the links Ash...probably good advice too!

Ashland's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-03-07

ice - I emailed a question into CNBC World this evening in regards to the dollar. The response the two gents gave was that the US has seen significant bear markets in the dollar in the past & this is not beyond the pale. Also, that the current decline in the US dollar is very helpful to trade balances which will be one of the catalysts for us to get out of this mess.

I agree that it's killing consumers. You suggested that people are filling up their gas tanks & a lot of the folks who are putting their $$ into their V8 trucks are the same who can't pay their mortgages & cards. Well, of course that's true. Will we see a realignment in demand this year? Does this mean we sell short automakers & discretionary goods? Maybe. Do we finally see big investments going into alternative energy? 10 - 15 yr solution, but I'd guess that will happen.

An interesting factoid - China has higher fuel standards than the US & the US's plans to increase CAFE standards is less ambitious than China's.

troll's picture
Offline
Joined: 2004-11-29

I'm no Phd candidate like Ice, but it seems to me that the $ like all markets, is overshooting its mark. Good thought in an earlier post on this thread (don't recall who posted it) that the other central banks will bring their rates down and that should help the USD. Its in their interest to do that, to help the U.S. With all this said, I think it will be a long long time, before we see dollar levels back to what we had been accustomed to until a few years back, simply because we are no longer, and probably wont ever be, THE dominant global economy of the world. We are still a strong player (obviously) but the weak dollar is just a result of us no longer being the be all and end all in the world economy.
As far as the markets to, and Bear Stearns/JPM news, if this isnt leading to the washout we've all been waiting for, I dont know what will. I wouldnt be surprised if we ended the day flat to up. (I'll probably come back here tonight with egg on my face)

troll's picture
Offline
Joined: 2004-11-29
fastcar's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-02-21

I would like to make the point tht I was not bragging about anything.  One of the forum participents asked me why my log in is fastcar.  I just honestly answered the question.  And then things were completely blown out of proportion.  I apoligize for going off thread. 
 
We have huge financial issues in the country.  I cannot answer for icecold, but I own everything outright, have positive net worth and am prepared for this global crisis.
 
 

BondGuy's picture
Offline
Joined: 2006-09-21

fastcar wrote:I would like to make the point tht I was not bragging about anything.  One of the forum participents asked me why my log in is fastcar.  I just honestly answered the question.  And then things were completely blown out of proportion.  I apoligize for going off thread. 
 
We have huge financial issues in the country.  I cannot answer for icecold, but I own everything outright, have positive net worth and am prepared for this global crisis.
 
 
 
Fastcar, you told us you owned a Ferrari. And not just any run of the mill Ferrari, but an F430. Now, personally, when you were asked about your car my money was on you coming back with a Lamborghini Reventon or maybe a Gallardo. Either of which would be much more fitting to your seeing red  blood in the streets perspective.
 
Your credibilty here is serverely damaged. Posting a pic would help.
 
On the other hand Ice comes off as very credible and his higher interest rate theory carries some weight. Whether he's right or wrong about that at least he can back it up with some solid reasoning. And by the way, he's right on one point, we're not coming out of this until we get the dollar headed in a different direction. All and all, not bad for a kid who drives a pick up truck and counts wide screen's as toys.
 
 

EDJ4now's picture
Offline
Joined: 2006-02-08

I hate these my d*ck is bigger than your d*ck posts anyway, but when it devolves to bragging about toys, this board drops to a new level of stupid.
 
While we're bragging about our spending habits, I've got a 27 incher that is pretty fuzzy for about 5 minutes until it gets warmed up.  It's kinda like HD, except with a thin layer of vasaline smeared on the screen.
 
I've also got enough in my checking account to by 4 HD tv's, quite a bit more than that in my "bad month cushion account", invested about 20% of last year's pay between retirement and other accounts, and have a net worth in my mid 30's exceeds that of many of my clients in their 50's.  It's not that I can't afford the toys, I just think it's stupid to buy them. 
 
Who would you rather have as a client, me or ice?

Ashland's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-03-07

Don't feed the troll.

BondGuy's picture
Offline
Joined: 2006-09-21

EDJ4now wrote:I hate these my d*ck is bigger than your d*ck posts anyway, but when it devolves to bragging about toys, this board drops to a new level of stupid.
 
While we're bragging about our spending habits, I've got a 27 incher that is pretty fuzzy for about 5 minutes until it gets warmed up.  It's kinda like HD, except with a thin layer of vasaline smeared on the screen.
 
I've also got enough in my checking account to by 4 HD tv's, quite a bit more than that in my "bad month cushion account", invested about 20% of last year's pay between retirement and other accounts, and have a net worth in my mid 30's exceeds that of many of my clients in their 50's.  It's not that I can't afford the toys, I just think it's stupid to buy them. 
 
Who would you rather have as a client, me or ice?
 
Well, hmm, tough one? I'd pick Ice. He's younger and has more earning years ahead. And I could always hit him up to borrow his truck if I need to run down to Home Depot to pick up a new refridgerator or something. And while were loading the truck he could lay some of that MBA karma on me and I might learn a thing or two.
 
Seriously, I didn't take Ice's post as a brag. Nor do I look at him as a spendthrift, which is how you're trying to paint him. Most of us have at least the bare essentials, house, car/truck/ furniture. As for Widescreens, not really toys. They are the only real option today when buying televisions. That said, I do think he responded unnecessarily with that post.
 
As for posting toys etc, Ok. This is a tough biz and toys are one form of reward. It pains me that so many find some of the toys posted ridiculous. Ok, you come on here as a 20 something claiming to own a Ferrari, even while possible, you deserve to get shot down. On the other hand ice claimed a Tundra, so why shoot that down?
 
 I'm the king of toys. My wife calls our garage " Bondguy's toy chest." and that doesn't count all the crap I've bought and sold over the years. I've blown a lot of money over the years and in hindsight I wouldn't mind having most of that dough back. But it is up to you how you spend your paycheck. Waste it or invest it. But what ever you do enjoy it. I tell you that to tell you  this, nobody cares. Outside of a few close friends and your family, nobody cares. Got a Tundra, nobody cares. Got an F430, nobody cares. Got a Rambow Pool Cue, nobody cares. Nobody cares what  "stuff" you've got. That doesn't mean don't buy it. Only that you should buy it to enjoy it, not to inventory it. Having an inventory of "stuff" is a poor measure of a life well lived.
 
Lastly, there is a price for owning all this "stuff."
 
Boats, a popular waste of money,  for example, come with seasonal bills for docking and storage. There is annual maintenance.  The total bill just to show up at the dock is between $100 and $125 a foot.  That doesn't count the direct operating cost of the boat or the fact that you're getting crushed on depreciation. And then, if you financed it, there is the note. Want a hot car? Get ready to pony up big time for the annual service bills. Some exotics could easily come with $3000 oil change bills attached.  Wanna do some grass roots racing, with cheapie Dodge Neon or something, could top 5k a year to race. How about racing sail boats?  That's gotta be cheaper right? Wrong!  Even something small, like a J 22 will cost over 10K a year to campaign. Up that to a J35 and you're looking easily looking at over 15k. Rip a chute and write a check for 7k before the next race. Ok, you're stayin on dry land and decide to become a member of the Ironbutt Association. The good news is it's really cheap to join, under $100 bucks. The bad news is the only way in is to ride a motorcycle 1000 miles in 24 hours. If you're serious about advancing within the associaton, not counting the 15 to 25k cost of the bike, the additonal 6 or 7k in gear you'll need, it will cost you at least 4 or 5k a year to run a few rallies and do a few IBA rides. That doesn't count the massive depreciation that putting 25k to 100k miles on that bike every year will do.  Of course sleepling at the Iron Butt motel will help cut down on costs. Still, there are plenty of ways to blow your money.
 
And there is nothing wrong with blowing it on any of these things. Look before you leap and like I said, enjoy it. Because nobody cares.

Indyone's picture
Offline
Joined: 2005-05-31

Leaving my Kawasaki Vulcan aside and getting mostly back on topic, are there any bears here that are completely out of US equities?

ExPropTrader's picture
Offline
Joined: 2006-11-19

Indyone wrote:Leaving my Kawasaki Vulcan aside and getting mostly back on topic, are there any bears here that are completely out of US equities?Think we need a(nother) motorcycle thread.I stopped short of calling BS on the 15-25k required for the IronButt, I know some morons have tried it on souped-up mopeds and 20 yr.-old 'Wings.

BondGuy's picture
Offline
Joined: 2006-09-21

Think we need a(nother) motorcycle thread.I stopped short of calling BS on the 15-25k required for the IronButt, I know some morons have tried it on souped-up mopeds and 20 yr.-old 'Wings.
 
Exprop, thank you for your restraint. And to drag this thread even further off topic, you are correct. Riding a Saddle Sore 1000 can be done on any bike. I'll stop on calling BS on your souped up mopeds comment. Let's just say, we both know better.
 
As for the cost I quoted please note I said; if you are serious about advancing within the association. To do so takes some serious gear. Let's review:
 
Bike: any bike will do but the go to machines of the IBA are the BMWs R1250GS, R1250RT, K1200LT, K1200GT. From the Japanese come the Honda Goldwing, ST1300, and Yamaha offers us the FJR1300. Harley has the Road King. And while I could run an IBA ride on my Honda Reflex NSS 250 scooter  it would be ill advised to do so. Of the bikes mentioned the ST1300 is $14,000 and the K1200LT is $24,000. Some wings and Harleys are in plus 25k price range. Remember, we're talking serious rider here, not weekend warriors doing charity rides and ice cream runs. And by the way, the bike will be completely worn out in two to three years. At least for our purposes here.
 
Moving on to gear:
 
Lights: HID headlight, PIA 910's coupled with PIA 1100xx on custom made brackets. That set up will soak up almost $2000.
 
Navigation: Garmin Street pilot 2700 series: $1100, Laptop or notebook computer, $800 to $1500. Software $200.
 
Range enhancement: Fuel cell: $500- $1500.
 
tires: I got 11k out of my last set of Metzlers- $400/set x 2 to 5 sets per year.
 
Major service: BMWs especially need to to be cared for: My last major service was $1300 but that was higher than usual, so let's put it about $800 x 2 per year. My wing was cheaper, but not by much.
 
Staying warm, and dry or cool and dry. waterproof breathable boots: $400, Aerostich Darien jacket and pants $800. Darien summer weight $800. Gerbings electric riding suit (wear under the Stich) $400. Goretex gloves $110. Summer weight gloves $$60. Two helmets, Nolan flip up 102 series, $300 each.
 
Full disclosure: some of this gear will last longer than a year. For example a fuel cell is a one time set up cost and i get about two years out of my riding suits and helmets. However, I didn't add in any of the costs of actually riding. You know, things like gas and tolls. Putting about 25k a year on the BMW K1200LT, even at 45 mpg, isn't a cheap endeavor. And the IBA, if done right, isn't an inexpensive pursuit. Which was my point.
 
Exprop, I did note the wink and smile, but its a very slow afternoon here.
 
 
 

Ashland's picture
Offline
Joined: 2007-03-07

pratoman wrote: I wouldnt be surprised if we ended the day flat to up. (I'll probably come back here tonight with egg on my face)

SOOO... What's going to happen tomorrow, Pratoman? Nice call!

ExPropTrader's picture
Offline
Joined: 2006-11-19

OK BG, I concede, no moped here.The ST would be my choice just cause I'm a sportbike-type of guy but it's probably not the best choice.  I really can't fathom someone trying the IB with a RoadKing though, that's an awful long way for the less-than-dependable hog.

Please or Register to post comments.

Industry Newsletters
Investment Category Sponsor Links

 

Sponsored Introduction Continue on to (or wait seconds) ×